CAUTERIZATION OF RECIPIENT LYMPHATIC VESSELS AND ITS EFFECT ON LYMPHOCELE FORMATION AFTER RENAL TRANSPLANTATION

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

NOURBALA M.H.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: KOWSAR MEDICAL JOURNAL Year:2002 | Volume:7 | Issue:part 2 Page(s): 163-166

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

941

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

CAUTERIZATION OF RECIPIENT LYMPHATIC VESSELS AND ITS EFFECT ON LYMPHOCELE FORMATION AFTER RENAL TRANSPLANTATION

Author(s)

NOURBALA M.H. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATIONQ3

LYMPHOCELE CAUTERIZATION.Q4

Abstract

This study tries to compare the effect of ligation and cautrization of the iliac lymphatic vessels of the recipient on the incidence of lymphocele formation after live heterotopic KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION in 578 cases. from 1992-1999 in 341 cases (study group) the lymphatics were cut after cauterization and in 237 cases (control group) the lymphatics were not cut or after cutting, the ligation has done with non absorbable sutures. In the study group in 43 months follow up, the lymphoceles that needed invasive procedures were not observed and in the control group one symptomatic lymphocele was recognized. In comparison of the two groups no significant difference was seen (P=O.47). It seems at least in living kidney donor transplantation ligating of the recipient lymphatic vessels has no advantage over cauterization.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

NOURBALA, M.H.. (2002). CAUTERIZATION OF RECIPIENT LYMPHATIC VESSELS AND ITS EFFECT ON LYMPHOCELE FORMATION AFTER RENAL TRANSPLANTATION. KOWSAR MEDICAL JOURNAL, 7(part 2), 163-166. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/361164/en

Vancouver: Copy

NOURBALA M.H.. CAUTERIZATION OF RECIPIENT LYMPHATIC VESSELS AND ITS EFFECT ON LYMPHOCELE FORMATION AFTER RENAL TRANSPLANTATION. KOWSAR MEDICAL JOURNAL[Internet]. 2002;7(part 2):163-166. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/361164/en

IEEE: Copy

M.H. NOURBALA, “CAUTERIZATION OF RECIPIENT LYMPHATIC VESSELS AND ITS EFFECT ON LYMPHOCELE FORMATION AFTER RENAL TRANSPLANTATION,” KOWSAR MEDICAL JOURNAL, vol. 7, no. part 2, pp. 163–166, 2002, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/361164/en

Related Journal Papers