مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,668
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

1

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF RECOVERY DURATION OF PROPOFOL AND THIOPENTAL SODIUM IN ECT

Pages

  46-49

Abstract

 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: THIOPENTAL SODIUM is not an ideal intravenous drug for inducing general anesthesia and compared to intravenous anesthetic drugs like PROPOFOL has a long standing RECOVERY time. The aim of this study was to compare the RECOVERY duration of PROPOFOL and THIOPENTAL SODIUM in ECT (Electroconvulsive Therapy).METHODS: In a clinical trial, 70 patients aged between 15-40 years old in A.S.A class I & II were selected for ECT.They were randomly divided into two groups of 35 patients. After patient monitoring, 2-3 mg/kg THIOPENTAL SODIUM or 1-1.5 mg/kg PROPOFOL (randomly in each patient) and then 0.5 mg/kg succinylcholine were administered. Patients were ventilated with mask and oxygen (%100). After ECT, seizure and RECOVERY durations were recorded. During these procedures, blood pressure and heart rate were recorded before and after ANESTHETIC INDUCTION and 1 and 5 min after ECT.FINDINGS: Mean RECOVERY duration of PROPOFOL and THIOPENTAL SODIUM were 5.49±2.57 min and 6.4±3.69 min, respectively (p=0.233). Also, seizure duration of PROPOFOL and THIOPENTAL SODIUM were 32.06±13.78 sec and 35.06±10.08 sec (P=0.302). Hemodynamic changes (systolic blood pressure) in two groups were not significant except at 1 minute after seizure (p<0.05).CONCLUSION: According to the results, there was not a significant difference between two groups in seizure and RECOVERY duration. But PROPOFOL can prevent increasing hemodynamic response to ECT better than THIOPENTAL SODIUM. In patients with hypertension or restriction of THIOPENTAL SODIUM, PROPOFOL can be a suitable replacement.

Cites

References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    ALE REZA, H., ALIJANPOUR, E., RABIEE, S.M., KHEYRKHAH, F., AMRI, P., & ELMI, S.M.. (2005). COMPARISON OF RECOVERY DURATION OF PROPOFOL AND THIOPENTAL SODIUM IN ECT. JOURNAL OF BABOL UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (JBUMS), 7(3 (27)), 46-49. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/362395/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    ALE REZA H., ALIJANPOUR E., RABIEE S.M., KHEYRKHAH F., AMRI P., ELMI S.M.. COMPARISON OF RECOVERY DURATION OF PROPOFOL AND THIOPENTAL SODIUM IN ECT. JOURNAL OF BABOL UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (JBUMS)[Internet]. 2005;7(3 (27)):46-49. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/362395/en

    IEEE: Copy

    H. ALE REZA, E. ALIJANPOUR, S.M. RABIEE, F. KHEYRKHAH, P. AMRI, and S.M. ELMI, “COMPARISON OF RECOVERY DURATION OF PROPOFOL AND THIOPENTAL SODIUM IN ECT,” JOURNAL OF BABOL UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (JBUMS), vol. 7, no. 3 (27), pp. 46–49, 2005, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/362395/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button