COMPARISON BETWEEN WHO AND ADA CRITERIA FOR DIAGNOSIS OF DIABETES MELLITUS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

AMINI MASOUD; HOSSEINPOUR M.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences Year:2001 | Volume:9 | Issue:3 Page(s): 21-24

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

2,579

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON BETWEEN WHO AND ADA CRITERIA FOR DIAGNOSIS OF DIABETES MELLITUS

Author(s)

AMINI MASOUD | HOSSEINPOUR M. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

DIABETESQ4

SCREENINGQ4

SENSITIVITYQ4

SPECIFICITYQ4

Abstract

To evaluate WHO and ADA criteria for diagnosis of DIABETES mellitus . 1606 subjects that referred to Isfahan Endocrine and Metabolism Research Center were examined for oral glucose tolerance test. Blood sugar was examined by enzymatic assay. SENSITIVITY, specifity , positive and negative predictive value of both criteria were assessed. For WHO criteria, SENSITIVITY of fasting blood sugar was 32% , specifity was 99% , positive predictive value was 65% and negative predictive value was 97%.For ADA criteria , SENSITIVITY of fasting blood sugar was 44%,SPECIFICITY was,98%,positive predictive value was 51% and negative predictive value was 98%.The SENSITIVITY, SPECIFICITY, positive and negative predictive values of ADA criteria for IGT diagnosis were 25%, 97.9%, 49% and 94% , respectively. This study suggests that although ADA criteria is more sensitive than WHO criteria for diagnosis of DIABETES mellitus, but it is insufficient for SCREENING of this disorder.

Cites

No record.

References

بررسی شیوع دیابت تیپ دو و IGT در افراد بالای 30 سال روستاهای زنجان

Cite

APA: Copy

AMINI, MASOUD, & HOSSEINPOUR, M.. (2001). COMPARISON BETWEEN WHO AND ADA CRITERIA FOR DIAGNOSIS OF DIABETES MELLITUS . JOURNAL OF SHAHID SADOUGHI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 9(3), 21-24. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/36352/en

Vancouver: Copy

AMINI MASOUD, HOSSEINPOUR M.. COMPARISON BETWEEN WHO AND ADA CRITERIA FOR DIAGNOSIS OF DIABETES MELLITUS . JOURNAL OF SHAHID SADOUGHI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2001;9(3):21-24. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/36352/en

IEEE: Copy

MASOUD AMINI, and M. HOSSEINPOUR, “COMPARISON BETWEEN WHO AND ADA CRITERIA FOR DIAGNOSIS OF DIABETES MELLITUS ,” JOURNAL OF SHAHID SADOUGHI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 21–24, 2001, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/36352/en

Related Journal Papers