On the Effect of Hard, Soft, Reciprocal, and Virtual Scaffolding Types on Iranian EFL Learners' Reading Strategy Development

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Asadipiran Noushin; Afraz Shahram; RAZMJOO SEYYED AYATOLLAH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: CRITICAL LANGUAGE & LITERARY STUDIES Year:2020 | Volume:17 | Issue:24 Page(s): 63-99

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

480

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

On the Effect of Hard, Soft, Reciprocal, and Virtual Scaffolding Types on Iranian EFL Learners' Reading Strategy Development

Author(s)

Asadipiran Noushin | Afraz Shahram | RAZMJOO SEYYED AYATOLLAH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Reading StrategyQ2

Scaffolding TypesQ1

Global StrategyQ1

Problem Solving StrategyQ1

Supporting StrategyQ1

Abstract

The present study was designed following a scaffolding principle of sociocultural theory (Wood, Bruner & Ross, 1976) with an attempt to investigate the role of the four scaffolding techniques, namely Hard, Soft (Saye & Brush, 2002), Reciprocal (Holton & Clarke, 2006), and Virtual (Yelland & Masters, 2007) in developing Reading Strategy of Iranian EFL learners. To accomplish the project, 80 homogeneous intermediate level male and female EFL learners with the age range of 19 to 25 in one of the language institutes in Bandar Abbas were chosen from 100 intermediate students according to their performance in a sample Preliminary English Test (PET) which was first piloted with 30 students with similar characteristics to check the reliability of the test. The selected participants were randomly divided into 4 groups, namely Soft Scaffolding Group (SSG), Hard Scaffolding Group (HSG), Reciprocal Scaffolding Group (RSG), and Virtual Scaffolding Group (VSG). The learners in all groups received a survey of reading strategies (Sheorey & Mokhtari, 2002), their respective intervention, and the survey of reading strategies as a posttest. Likewise, in the qualitative section of the study, the learners’ self-reports as well as the teacher’ s observations were used to collect the data. The collected data were analyzed through SPSS software version 25, employing one-way ANOVA and multivariate ANOVA (MANOVA) to compare the mean scores of the four experimental groups on the posttest reading strategies. The qualitative data pertained to the learners’ reports and teacher’ s classroom observations were analyzed using open and axial coding methods. In terms of reading strategies, the results revealed that not only traditional and virtual scaffolding treatments had different effects on the development of global, problem solving, and supporting reading strategies among Iranian EFL learners, the hard scaffolding group (as a traditional scaffolding group) had the highest use of reading strategies followed by the virtual scaffolding group. Nevertheless, reciprocal and soft scaffolding groups (following other traditional forms of scaffolding) similarly had less use of reading strategies. Findings of this study extended earlier understandings of scaffolding in an EFL environment and could contribute to the advancement of future courses in terms of their scaffolding pedagogical aspects.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Asadipiran, Noushin, Afraz, Shahram, & RAZMJOO, SEYYED AYATOLLAH. (2020). On the Effect of Hard, Soft, Reciprocal, and Virtual Scaffolding Types on Iranian EFL Learners' Reading Strategy Development. CRITICAL LANGUAGE & LITERARY STUDIES, 17(24 ), 63-99. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/365483/en

Vancouver: Copy

Asadipiran Noushin, Afraz Shahram, RAZMJOO SEYYED AYATOLLAH. On the Effect of Hard, Soft, Reciprocal, and Virtual Scaffolding Types on Iranian EFL Learners' Reading Strategy Development. CRITICAL LANGUAGE & LITERARY STUDIES[Internet]. 2020;17(24 ):63-99. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/365483/en

IEEE: Copy

Noushin Asadipiran, Shahram Afraz, and SEYYED AYATOLLAH RAZMJOO, “On the Effect of Hard, Soft, Reciprocal, and Virtual Scaffolding Types on Iranian EFL Learners' Reading Strategy Development,” CRITICAL LANGUAGE & LITERARY STUDIES, vol. 17, no. 24 , pp. 63–99, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/365483/en

Related Journal Papers