A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF THE PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS OF MATHEW LIPMAN

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

JAHANI J.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES Year:2002 | Volume:12 | Issue:42 Page(s): 35-56

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

5,479

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF THE PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS OF MATHEW LIPMAN"S CRITICAL THINKING MODEL

Author(s)

JAHANI J. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Not Registered.

Abstract

Mathew Lipmans model is one of the important models in teaching critical thinking. It was suggested toward the end of the 1960s and then operatationalized by the institute for the Advancement of Philosophy for children. The purpose of this article is to study and criticize the philosophical foundations & underlying assumptions of Lipman s model. In this regard, the two main Philosophical principles of the model have been analyzed. These principles are contextualism and relativism. It is shown that Lipmans model, due to its emphasis on contextualism, can not preserve generalizability, an important component of critical thinking. Moreover, supporting relativism at the cost of rejecting objectivity has confronted the model with serious limitations. To remove these limitations, this research recommends that: 1) A contextual objectivism should be accepted as the foundation of teaching critical thinking; 2) Critical thinking is not Solely an instruction subject, rather it should be considered as a cognitive attitudinal process whose mainpurpose is tofoster critical spirit.

Cites

References

Cite

APA: Copy

JAHANI, J.. (2002). A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF THE PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS OF MATHEW LIPMAN"S CRITICAL THINKING MODEL. JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES, 12(42), 35-56. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/366962/en

Vancouver: Copy

JAHANI J.. A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF THE PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS OF MATHEW LIPMAN"S CRITICAL THINKING MODEL. JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES[Internet]. 2002;12(42):35-56. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/366962/en

IEEE: Copy

J. JAHANI, “A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF THE PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS OF MATHEW LIPMAN"S CRITICAL THINKING MODEL,” JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES, vol. 12, no. 42, pp. 35–56, 2002, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/366962/en

Related Journal Papers