Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,399
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF TIME DURATION AND FREQUENCY OF ELECTRICAL STIMULATION ON WOUND HEALING

Pages

  23-28

Abstract

 Introduction: It has been shown that the ELECTRICAL STIMULATION has improved the skin blood circulation and WOUND HEALING in animals. The present study was conducted to determine standard model of minimum current and period of ELECTRICAL STIMULATION that will influence WOUND HEALING. Materials and methods: For this propose 35mm incisions (35mm length) were made at the back of Dutch rabbits. Due to the propose previous studies the five groups animals were stimulated by the electrical impulses(80Hz and 500 ms) as followed: Group one was stimulated: four times daily, 4 days, 10 min. Group two: four times daily, 4 days, 30min. Group three: onetime daily, 4days, 120min. Group four: two times daily, 7days, 30min. Group five: four times daily, 7days, 30min. Group six: Received no ELECTRICAL STIMULATION as control group .the wounds length, area and period of healing were recorded as well as the tensile strength.Results: The results of this study indicated that the duration of wounds healing in all experimental groups was significantly less than control group(P<0.05).Conclusion: Regard to effects of electrical currents on the skin blood flow and the least of ELECTRICAL STIMULATION in group one and significantly reduced healing period in this group in comparison with control group and other indices as well, we suppose suppose that increasing frequency of ELECTRICAL STIMULATION while shortening time duration, improve the skin blood circulation and WOUND HEALING period while decreasing the side effects

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    KHATIBI, M.R., AGHAGANI, M., HAJIZADEH, S., & KALALIAN, H.. (2003). COMPARISON OF TIME DURATION AND FREQUENCY OF ELECTRICAL STIMULATION ON WOUND HEALING . KOOMESH, 4(1-2), 23-28. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/36982/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    KHATIBI M.R., AGHAGANI M., HAJIZADEH S., KALALIAN H.. COMPARISON OF TIME DURATION AND FREQUENCY OF ELECTRICAL STIMULATION ON WOUND HEALING . KOOMESH[Internet]. 2003;4(1-2):23-28. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/36982/en

    IEEE: Copy

    M.R. KHATIBI, M. AGHAGANI, S. HAJIZADEH, and H. KALALIAN, “COMPARISON OF TIME DURATION AND FREQUENCY OF ELECTRICAL STIMULATION ON WOUND HEALING ,” KOOMESH, vol. 4, no. 1-2, pp. 23–28, 2003, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/36982/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top