Applicability of the treatment and preference approaches

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Amanie Ahmad; REZVANTALAB MOHAMMADREZA

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: KETAB-E-QAYYEM Year:2020 | Volume:10 | Issue:22 Page(s): 385-407

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

435

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Applicability of the treatment and preference approaches

Author(s)

Amanie Ahmad | REZVANTALAB MOHAMMADREZA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ContradictionQ1

Curing statementsQ1

PreferenceQ2

Unchallengeability RationalityQ1

Abstract

A basic problem in jurisprudence and Hadith science is the existence of contradictory statements. Such Contradictions are sometimes non-rooted and can be removed by the addition of concepts of two or more statements together, but some others are sustained and cannot be resolved through the reconciliation of several statements. In the latter case, two statements are either of the same reference and tenet or one is preferable to the other. Once the two are conceptually or referentially the same, a treatment approach can be used to rule out both or maintain both as options. However, if the two statements are not the same, one can be accepted as a matter of Preference. It is to be noted that this kind of cure is implemented only on two statements with a formidable difference. The question is whether or not a Preference approach can be applied to two statements with just a slight Contradiction, or it is possible to overlook a Preference recommended in documented Hadiths in favor of a non-recommended Preference. The other question is if the Contradiction between two pieces of evidence can be cured just like two contradictory concepts can. This research seeks to find answers to these questions with regard to unchallengeability and rationality as two ways of approaching the Preference issue. According to the first way, it seems difficult to overlook documented Preferences, let alone overlooking the Contradiction between concepts with an already documented cure and discussing the difference of evidence instead. The advocates of rationality, however, have it easy to deal with Contradiction; they simply feel free to take one Hadith and leave the other.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Amanie, Ahmad, & REZVANTALAB, MOHAMMADREZA. (2020). Applicability of the treatment and preference approaches. KETAB-E-QAYYEM, 10(22 ), 385-407. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/370613/en

Vancouver: Copy

Amanie Ahmad, REZVANTALAB MOHAMMADREZA. Applicability of the treatment and preference approaches. KETAB-E-QAYYEM[Internet]. 2020;10(22 ):385-407. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/370613/en

IEEE: Copy

Ahmad Amanie, and MOHAMMADREZA REZVANTALAB, “Applicability of the treatment and preference approaches,” KETAB-E-QAYYEM, vol. 10, no. 22 , pp. 385–407, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/370613/en

Related Journal Papers