Analyzing the Different Criticism Methods in Architecture Studios

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Alizadeh Miandouab Aynaz; AKRAMI GHOLAM REZA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN PLANNING Year:2019 | Volume:12 | Issue:24 Page(s): 47-62

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

566

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Analyzing the Different Criticism Methods in Architecture Studios

Author(s)

Alizadeh Miandouab Aynaz | AKRAMI GHOLAM REZA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

DesignQ1

architectureQ2

studioQ1

criticismQ3

correctionQ1

Abstract

Architectural Design is a major challenge faced by architecture students during their training period. This paper analyses architectural studios in order to find the weaknesses and strengths, and also to identify methods and tools that can be used to support both learning and teaching studio-based methods in architecture. The main purpose of this study was to analyze the different criticism and correction methods in architectural Design courses and their effectiveness on student teaching-learning process. Current common learning style in architectural Design studios has inherent problems, which results from the fact that professors teach students in ways that are mainly based on their personal experience. At the same time, professors who are sometimes professional architects can criticize their own professional insights and applied knowledge, however, they further tend to comment on the work of students, without having proper understanding of "criticism" or its application in architectural Design educations. A professor in architectural studio must anticipate and examine a wide range of issues and factors. criticism is one of the most important and effective factors in activation of Design thinking. Hence, practice of "criticism" not only among professor and students, but also among classmates is very effective and necessary for transferring concepts, learning and communication. Therefore, a professor should have the art of criticism to provide opportunities for "criticism" among his/her pupils. In today’ s education system, which is based on critique, all the efforts are aimed to increase students’ self-criticizing capability to able to manage their own projects. The main factors in the critique that are performed by the professors include the steps of: defining a Design or explaining it, describing, analyzing, and architectural judgment according to the Design. The current model in studios is based on ancient model that must be redefined in order to improve pedagogy state. In this research, different types of critique are examined such as desk criticism, group criticism, informal interaction, interim review, formal or final review and new evaluation methods such as peer criticism, public criticism, seminar, written criticism, panel discussion, exhibition and internet correction. correction, like a dialogue, is a two-way relationship. The meetings between the teacher and the student are deliberately aimed at raising the mind and hands of the student as a Designer, and both the teacher and the student know well that the Design theme and the lines ahead of them are the ways to become a Designer. The study population consisted of 57 male and female students of Urmia University in architectural Design courses, which were divided into three different groups. Each group of students was asked what is the most effective way to transfer knowledge, experience, workshop knowledge & learning with regard to various types of corrections. The following results were obtained by comparing the answers of the three groups: students in the preliminary Design courses (1) and (2) considered individual correction (desk criticism) and panel discussion more effective than other learning methods. Students of architectural Design courses (1) and (2) did not consider individual correction as an appropriate method. They believed that group criticism and correction play a more effective role in learning. Students in Design courses (3), (4) and (5) while emphasizing the effectiveness of group criticism, considered temporary delivery (interim review) as an effective learning method.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Alizadeh Miandouab, Aynaz, & AKRAMI, GHOLAM REZA. (2019). Analyzing the Different Criticism Methods in Architecture Studios. JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN PLANNING, 12(24 ), 47-62. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/371343/en

Vancouver: Copy

Alizadeh Miandouab Aynaz, AKRAMI GHOLAM REZA. Analyzing the Different Criticism Methods in Architecture Studios. JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN PLANNING[Internet]. 2019;12(24 ):47-62. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/371343/en

IEEE: Copy

Aynaz Alizadeh Miandouab, and GHOLAM REZA AKRAMI, “Analyzing the Different Criticism Methods in Architecture Studios,” JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN PLANNING, vol. 12, no. 24 , pp. 47–62, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/371343/en

Related Journal Papers