The Relativity of Scientific Rationality in Kuhn and Cassirer

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KALBASI ASHTARI HOSSEIN; Hajizadeh Amir

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: PAZHUHESHHA-YE ELM VA DIN (SCIENCE AND RELIGION STUDIES) Year:2020 | Volume:9 | Issue:2 Page(s): 73-95

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

239

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

The Relativity of Scientific Rationality in Kuhn and Cassirer

Author(s)

KALBASI ASHTARI HOSSEIN | Hajizadeh Amir | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Scientific RationalityQ1

incommensurabilityQ2

KuhnQ1

CassirerQ1

ConceptQ2

FunctionQ1

Abstract

Since the publication of Thomas Kuhn’ s influential book, The Structure of the Scientific Revolutions, historical and sociological approaches to science have led to a kind of relativism towards the evaluation of theories as well as the belief in the break in the history of science. The main idea put by Kuhn's historiography is incommensurability. From Kuhn's point of view, the scientific Concepts refers to completely different entities in different theories. On the other hand, each paradigm changes the perceptual domain before the Conceptual process and formal articulation. Finally, unlike the conventional philosophy of science (Positivism and Falsifiability), he mentions there is no explicit rule for justification of theories. In contrast, Cassirer emphasis on elements in theory as the invariant regulative forms through which scientific thought progress continuously. In this paper, Cassirer's responses to Kuhn have been formulated. At the end, we attempt to show how diverse types of historiography made their difference.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

KALBASI ASHTARI, HOSSEIN, & Hajizadeh, Amir. (2020). The Relativity of Scientific Rationality in Kuhn and Cassirer. PAZHUHESHHA-YE ELM VA DIN (SCIENCE AND RELIGION STUDIES), 9(2 ), 73-95. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/372780/en

Vancouver: Copy

KALBASI ASHTARI HOSSEIN, Hajizadeh Amir. The Relativity of Scientific Rationality in Kuhn and Cassirer. PAZHUHESHHA-YE ELM VA DIN (SCIENCE AND RELIGION STUDIES)[Internet]. 2020;9(2 ):73-95. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/372780/en

IEEE: Copy

HOSSEIN KALBASI ASHTARI, and Amir Hajizadeh, “The Relativity of Scientific Rationality in Kuhn and Cassirer,” PAZHUHESHHA-YE ELM VA DIN (SCIENCE AND RELIGION STUDIES), vol. 9, no. 2 , pp. 73–95, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/372780/en

Related Journal Papers