Teaching Medical Students: Computer-Based Teaching versus Traditional Lecture

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MOTTAGHI PEYMAN; NAJIMI ARASH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Iranian Journal of Medical Education Year:2018 | Volume:18 | Issue:81 Page(s): 1-7

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

811

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Teaching Medical Students: Computer-Based Teaching versus Traditional Lecture

Author(s)

MOTTAGHI PEYMAN | NAJIMI ARASH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

LectureQ2

computer based learningQ1

self-learningQ2

learningQ2

medical studentsQ2

Abstract

Introduction: Lecture and computer-based teaching are two important methods for the teaching of medical students. However, comparison of the effectiveness and efficacy of both of these methods shows substantial deficiencies. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of Lecture and computer-based teaching methods on the learning of medical students taking introduction to clinical medicine (ICM) courses at Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Methods: This study was a quasi-experimental research which was conducted in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Research population included students taking ICM courses in two consecutive semesters. The first group of students were assigned to the control group (n=67) and were taught rheumatology through in-class Lecture method while the second group of students (the intervention group) received computer-based teaching. For evaluation and comparison of the effects of the intervention on learning, two multiple-choice question tests were administered at the end of the training course and 8 weeks after the intervention. Results: No significant difference was found between the mean scores of the two groups in the first test (p=0. 77), but the difference in the second test was significant (p<0. 001). The computer-based teaching group performed better in recalling of the learning materials. Conclusion: Although short-term results were similar in both groups, long-term learning and recalling were greater with computer-based teaching than with Lecture.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MOTTAGHI, PEYMAN, & NAJIMI, ARASH. (2018). Teaching Medical Students: Computer-Based Teaching versus Traditional Lecture. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, 18(81 ), 1-7. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/373030/en

Vancouver: Copy

MOTTAGHI PEYMAN, NAJIMI ARASH. Teaching Medical Students: Computer-Based Teaching versus Traditional Lecture. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION[Internet]. 2018;18(81 ):1-7. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/373030/en

IEEE: Copy

PEYMAN MOTTAGHI, and ARASH NAJIMI, “Teaching Medical Students: Computer-Based Teaching versus Traditional Lecture,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, vol. 18, no. 81 , pp. 1–7, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/373030/en

Related Journal Papers