PLATO'S TENDENCY TO PHILOSOPHY AND FARABI'S TO SHARIAH: DUAL CHOICES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ALI HOSSEINI A.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: NAMEH-YE-MOFID Year:2006 | Volume:11 | Issue:2 (50 PHILOSOPHY) Page(s): 67-84

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,171

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

PLATO'S TENDENCY TO PHILOSOPHY AND FARABI'S TO SHARIAH: DUAL CHOICES

Author(s)

ALI HOSSEINI A. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

EPISTEMOLOGYQ3

KNOWLEDGEQ3

POLITICAL PHILOSOPHYQ3

FIGH'HQ2

LAWQ2

Abstract

The comparison between Greek and Islamic thoughts, in general, and between Plato's and Farabi's, in particular, can demonstrate, to some extend, the tendency of the former to philosophy and the latter to Shariah although the founders of these philosophers emphasize their considerable common aspects. The EPISTEMOLOGY and ontology presented by these two thinkers end in prominence of KNOWLEDGE in their views. In Plato's thought, KNOWLEDGE, in terms of theory, results in philosophy whereas in terms of practice, it results in LAW. This LAW constitutes natural LAW in the reign of the philosopher king and after this period, this is the philosopher who leaves his written LAW and trains some LAWmakers. In Farabi's view, however, KNOWLEDGE, in terms of theory, results in philosophy as well as knowing Shariah whereas, in terms of practice, it ends in LAW. LAW in the First King era constitutes Divine Nomos that is Sharia, after that era, all affairs will be governed in accordance with FIGH'H (Islamic jurisprudence), and apparently a faghih (Islamic jurisprudent) does not need philosophy.

Cites

EXPLANATION OF THE COMPONENTS OF THE CURRICULUM BASED ON THE EDUCATIONAL APPROACHES OF PLATO AND FARABI

References

سخنی چند پیرامون مدینه فاضله فارابی

Cite

APA: Copy

ALI HOSSEINI, A.. (2006). PLATO'S TENDENCY TO PHILOSOPHY AND FARABI'S TO SHARIAH: DUAL CHOICES. NAMEH-YE-MOFID, 11(2 (50 PHILOSOPHY)), 67-84. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/3741/en

Vancouver: Copy

ALI HOSSEINI A.. PLATO'S TENDENCY TO PHILOSOPHY AND FARABI'S TO SHARIAH: DUAL CHOICES. NAMEH-YE-MOFID[Internet]. 2006;11(2 (50 PHILOSOPHY)):67-84. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/3741/en

IEEE: Copy

A. ALI HOSSEINI, “PLATO'S TENDENCY TO PHILOSOPHY AND FARABI'S TO SHARIAH: DUAL CHOICES,” NAMEH-YE-MOFID, vol. 11, no. 2 (50 PHILOSOPHY), pp. 67–84, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/3741/en

Related Journal Papers