THE TWO TRENDS OF 
AKHBA-RIYYA AND SALAFIYYA IN CONFRONTATION WITH CANONICAL RATIONALITY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

JAHANGIRI MOHSEN; NASERI MOGHADAM H.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC STUDIES Year:621 | Volume: | Issue: Page(s): 35-73

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

1,344

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE TWO TRENDS OF AKHBA-RIYYA AND SALAFIYYA IN CONFRONTATION WITH CANONICAL RATIONALITY

Author(s)

JAHANGIRI MOHSEN | NASERI MOGHADAM H. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

SANS-SERIF"> AKHBA-RIYYAQ4

SALAFIYYAQ3

FUNDAMENTALISMQ3

LEGAL REASONINGQ3

INTELLECTQ4

JURISPRUDENCEQ4

RELIGIOUS LAWQ3

RULINGSQ4

Abstract

The history of Islamic JURISPRUDENCE has witnessed two heterogeneous yet apparently similar trends–although in two different periods of time and manifestations. One is the Akhbāriyya movement in Imāmī school, which, with a new approach to practicing sharī’a and while negating ijtihād (legal reasoning), regards INTELLECT as being unable to achieve legal RULINGS.The second trend is the SALAFIYYA among the Sunnīs, which, although a basically ideological trend and not merely a jurisprudential movement, has specific views in the field of JURISPRUDENCE and religious law largely similar to those of the khbāriyya.An in-depth deliberation on the doctrines, major approaches, and methodology of these two important fundamentalist trends will reveal the existence of conformities and possibly certain interactions between them.The confrontation of these two trends with the process of LEGAL REASONING, negation of rationality in the domain of ordinances, regarding the reasoning and rational arguments as unjustified in understanding RELIGIOUS LAW and complete reliance on traditions are among the issues that seem to be homogenous and consistent between the two.It is attempted in this research to survey and ponder on some instances of the similarities of these trends, particularly their view on INTELLECT.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

JAHANGIRI, MOHSEN, & NASERI MOGHADAM, H.. (2009). THE TWO TRENDS OF AKHBA^-RIYYA AND SALAFIYYA IN CONFRONTATION WITH CANONICAL RATIONALITY. JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC STUDIES, -(81-1 (ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE AND ITS PRINCIPLES)), 35-73. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/378486/en

Vancouver: Copy

JAHANGIRI MOHSEN, NASERI MOGHADAM H.. THE TWO TRENDS OF AKHBA^-RIYYA AND SALAFIYYA IN CONFRONTATION WITH CANONICAL RATIONALITY. JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC STUDIES[Internet]. 2009;-(81-1 (ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE AND ITS PRINCIPLES)):35-73. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/378486/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHSEN JAHANGIRI, and H. NASERI MOGHADAM, “THE TWO TRENDS OF AKHBA^-RIYYA AND SALAFIYYA IN CONFRONTATION WITH CANONICAL RATIONALITY,” JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC STUDIES, vol. -, no. 81-1 (ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE AND ITS PRINCIPLES), pp. 35–73, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/378486/en

Related Journal Papers