A REVIEW OF WILLIAM ROWE'S VIEWPOINT ON JUSTIFICATION OF RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KASHFI ABDOLRASOOL

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal Of Religious Thought Year:2012 | Volume:- | Issue:42 Page(s): 3-14

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,710

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A REVIEW OF WILLIAM ROWE'S VIEWPOINT ON JUSTIFICATION OF RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE

Author(s)

KASHFI ABDOLRASOOL | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCEQ2

THE PRINCIPLE OF CREDULITYQ2

THE PRINCIPLE OF TESTIMONYQ2

CHECKING PROCEDURESQ2

WILLIAM L. ROWEQ2

RICHARD SWINBURNEQ2

Abstract

Argument from RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE is one of the most important arguments for the existence of God. Contemporary philosopher and theologian, RICHARD SWINBURNE, and some of his followers, believe that justification of RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE is based on two principles, THE PRINCIPLE OF TESTIMONY and THE PRINCIPLE OF CREDULITY, one of which, THE PRINCIPLE OF CREDULITY, is criticized by some epistemologists as WILLIAM L. ROWE. Rowe believes that since in perception, we can distinguish true beliefs from illusory ones by CHECKING PROCEDURES, we can use THE PRINCIPLE OF CREDULITY for perceptual beliefs, whereas in RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE, since there are no such procedures, we cannot use THE PRINCIPLE OF CREDULITY.The impossibility of using this principle in RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE, as Rowe thinks, means that the argument from RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE is not documented. This article, after formulating THE PRINCIPLE OF CREDULITY, argument from RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE, and Rowe’s criticism, tries to defend THE PRINCIPLE OF CREDULITY against Rowe’s criticism.

Cites

References

RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE AND THE PRINCIPLE OF CREDULITY

Cite

APA: Copy

KASHFI, ABDOLRASOOL. (2012). A REVIEW OF WILLIAM ROWE'S VIEWPOINT ON JUSTIFICATION OF RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE. JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS THOUGHT, -(42), 3-14. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/380573/en

Vancouver: Copy

KASHFI ABDOLRASOOL. A REVIEW OF WILLIAM ROWE'S VIEWPOINT ON JUSTIFICATION OF RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE. JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS THOUGHT[Internet]. 2012;-(42):3-14. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/380573/en

IEEE: Copy

ABDOLRASOOL KASHFI, “A REVIEW OF WILLIAM ROWE'S VIEWPOINT ON JUSTIFICATION OF RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE,” JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS THOUGHT, vol. -, no. 42, pp. 3–14, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/380573/en

Related Journal Papers