Explaining Performance Evaluation Criteria for University Faculty Members: A Qualitative Study

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Raoufi Kelachayeh Seyedeh Susan; ASKARIAN MOSTAFA; HAMIDIFAR FATEMEH; Rezazadeh Bahadoran Hamidreza

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION MANAGEMENT (JHPM) Year:2020 | Volume:9 | Issue:3 Page(s): 72-83

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

525

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Explaining Performance Evaluation Criteria for University Faculty Members: A Qualitative Study

Author(s)

Raoufi Kelachayeh Seyedeh Susan | ASKARIAN MOSTAFA | HAMIDIFAR FATEMEH | Rezazadeh Bahadoran Hamidreza | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Performance evaluationQ2

FacultyQ2

Qualitative studyQ2

Content analysisQ2

Abstract

Introduction: Evaluation in any organization is an essential part of maintaining and sustaining the organization. The purpose of this study was to determine the evaluation criteria of Faculty members' performance. Methods: The present study was conducted using qualitative Content analysis method, in which 20 Faculty members, specialized in educational management and evaluation and university departments managers were selected for semi-structured interviews. Sampling was purposive and snowball method. The robustness of the data was confirmed by participants and external controls. Data were analyzed using Content analysis approach. Resluts: Interview data consisted of 6 main themes and 21 sub-themes. The main themes include: research activity (3 sub-themes), educational activities (3 sub-themes), executive services (2 subthemes), development (4 sub-themes), professional ethics (3 sub-themes) and ethics individual was (6 sub-themes). Conclusions: The findings showed an in-depth understanding of Faculty performance criteria in 6 main themes and 21 sub-themes. It is suggested that the findings of the present study be used to evaluate the performance of university lecturers.

Cites

Developing and Psychometrics "Scale of Performance Evaluation Criteria for University Faculty Members"

References

Cite

APA: Copy

Raoufi Kelachayeh, Seyedeh Susan, ASKARIAN, MOSTAFA, HAMIDIFAR, FATEMEH, & Rezazadeh Bahadoran, Hamidreza. (2020). Explaining Performance Evaluation Criteria for University Faculty Members: A Qualitative Study. JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION MANAGEMENT (JHPM), 9(3 ), 72-83. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/382724/en

Vancouver: Copy

Raoufi Kelachayeh Seyedeh Susan, ASKARIAN MOSTAFA, HAMIDIFAR FATEMEH, Rezazadeh Bahadoran Hamidreza. Explaining Performance Evaluation Criteria for University Faculty Members: A Qualitative Study. JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION MANAGEMENT (JHPM)[Internet]. 2020;9(3 ):72-83. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/382724/en

IEEE: Copy

Seyedeh Susan Raoufi Kelachayeh, MOSTAFA ASKARIAN, FATEMEH HAMIDIFAR, and Hamidreza Rezazadeh Bahadoran, “Explaining Performance Evaluation Criteria for University Faculty Members: A Qualitative Study,” JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION MANAGEMENT (JHPM), vol. 9, no. 3 , pp. 72–83, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/382724/en

Related Journal Papers