A Critical Appraisal of Legal Pluralism

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

RASEKH MOHAMMAD; BAYAT KOMITAKI MAHNAZ; MOHAMMADI SARA

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Legal Research Year:2018 | Volume:21 | Issue:83 Page(s): 63-85

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

348

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A Critical Appraisal of Legal Pluralism

Author(s)

RASEKH MOHAMMAD | BAYAT KOMITAKI MAHNAZ | MOHAMMADI SARA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

legal pluralismQ2

state-made lawQ1

non-state lawQ1

classic approachQ1

Abstract

legal pluralism, in broad terms, refers to the coexistence of two or more legal systems under the one and same state. In narrower terms, legal pluralism implies plural state-made laws and the reflection of social and cultural plurality in a legal system of a state. The concept, in its broad sense, embodies this outlook that law is not limited to the institution of the state, and that the state is only one of the authorities that make legal rules in the society. Accordingly, the concept of legal pluralism gives rise to diverse and important discussions on the scope and meaning of the concept of law. In addition to the conceptual controversies with which legal pluralism is encountered, the significant methodological criticism is that legal pluralist theories lack a clear and precise criterion for distinguishing law from other social phenomena. Considering all normative orders as legal will lead to certain conceptual confusions, which undermines main claims of legal pluralism and make them unjustified.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

RASEKH, MOHAMMAD, BAYAT KOMITAKI, MAHNAZ, & MOHAMMADI, SARA. (2018). A Critical Appraisal of Legal Pluralism. REVUE DE RECHERCHE JURIDIQUE, 21(83 ), 63-85. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/383217/en

Vancouver: Copy

RASEKH MOHAMMAD, BAYAT KOMITAKI MAHNAZ, MOHAMMADI SARA. A Critical Appraisal of Legal Pluralism. REVUE DE RECHERCHE JURIDIQUE[Internet]. 2018;21(83 ):63-85. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/383217/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMAD RASEKH, MAHNAZ BAYAT KOMITAKI, and SARA MOHAMMADI, “A Critical Appraisal of Legal Pluralism,” REVUE DE RECHERCHE JURIDIQUE, vol. 21, no. 83 , pp. 63–85, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/383217/en

Related Journal Papers