CONE BEAM VOLUMETRIC TOMOGRAPHY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN EVALUATION OF PARANASAL SINUSES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

VARSHOSAZ MASOUD; SHARIFI SANAZ

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Tehran University Medical Journal Year:2010 | Volume:68 | Issue:7 Page(s): 406-411

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,286

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

CONE BEAM VOLUMETRIC TOMOGRAPHY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN EVALUATION OF PARANASAL SINUSES

Author(s)

VARSHOSAZ MASOUD | SHARIFI SANAZ | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CONVENTIONALQ3

COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHYQ3

CONE BEAM VOLUMETRIC COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHYQ3

PARANASAL SINUSESQ3

Abstract

Background: Paranasal sinus disease is one of the most common problems of patients that refer to ENT centers. Adding to clinical examination, imaging plays an important role in diagnosis and treatment. Also the imaging of PARANASAL SINUSES is necessary before surgery. Although COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY is the modality of choice for these areas, it has some disadvantages which the most important one is its high patient's dose. The aim of this study is the comparison between cone beam volumetric tomography and CONVENTIONAL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY, in evaluation of these areas.Methods: In this descriptive-analytic study Coronal COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY imaged and cone beam volumetric tomography images were performed for40 patients referred to ENT department of Amir Aelam Hospital in Tehran, Iran. COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY images were observed by general radiologist and cone beam volumetric tomography images by Maxillofacial radiologist and their results' were recorded. Also ENT surgeon recorded her observations during surgery. Data were analyzed using Mc Nemar test with Kappa and weighted Kappa agreement coefficient.Results: No statistical difference was shown between the efficacy of COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY and cone beam volumetric tomography in evaluation of PARANASAL SINUSES (p>0.05).Conclusion: As there was not any difference between CONVENTIONAL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY and cone beam volumetric tomography in the assessment of PARANASAL SINUSES and additional advantages of the later, cone beam volumetric tomography is suggested for paranasal sinus imaging before surgery.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

VARSHOSAZ, MASOUD, & SHARIFI, SANAZ. (2010). CONE BEAM VOLUMETRIC TOMOGRAPHY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN EVALUATION OF PARANASAL SINUSES. TEHRAN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL JOURNAL (TUMJ), 68(7), 406-411. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/38487/en

Vancouver: Copy

VARSHOSAZ MASOUD, SHARIFI SANAZ. CONE BEAM VOLUMETRIC TOMOGRAPHY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN EVALUATION OF PARANASAL SINUSES. TEHRAN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL JOURNAL (TUMJ)[Internet]. 2010;68(7):406-411. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/38487/en

IEEE: Copy

MASOUD VARSHOSAZ, and SANAZ SHARIFI, “CONE BEAM VOLUMETRIC TOMOGRAPHY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN EVALUATION OF PARANASAL SINUSES,” TEHRAN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL JOURNAL (TUMJ), vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 406–411, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/38487/en

Related Journal Papers