Evaluating the Opinions of Opponents of Religious Science (Based on Abdul Karim Soroush Ideas)

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Shahgoli A.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: KNOWLEDGE STUDIES IN THE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY Year:2020 | Volume:24 | Issue:2 (83) Page(s): 331-352

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

465

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Evaluating the Opinions of Opponents of Religious Science (Based on Abdul Karim Soroush Ideas)

Author(s)

Shahgoli A. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

religious scienceQ1

religious denialQ1

reason for denial of religious scienceQ1

abdul karim soroushQ1

Abstract

Opponents of religious science deny the production of religious science from variety of perspectives. One of the most famous oppositions of religious science in our society is may mentioned of abdul karim soroush. This article explains and evaluates opinions of Soroush concerning religious science. Method: The method of collecting information is library and in deduction is descriptive, analysis, and critique. Results: In order to deny religious science Soroush has used various arguments, most of which are as following: Denial of religious science through distorting the debatable issue, refusal of religious science, denial of religious science through subject, method, and the end, the process of production of science, empirical concept of science, separation of knowledge from value, and a minimalistic approach to religion. Conclusion: Soroush's arguments in denying religious science is basically challengeable.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Shahgoli, A.. (2020). Evaluating the Opinions of Opponents of Religious Science (Based on Abdul Karim Soroush Ideas). KNOWLEDGE STUDIES IN THE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY, 24(2 (83) ), 331-352. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/388411/en

Vancouver: Copy

Shahgoli A.. Evaluating the Opinions of Opponents of Religious Science (Based on Abdul Karim Soroush Ideas). KNOWLEDGE STUDIES IN THE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY[Internet]. 2020;24(2 (83) ):331-352. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/388411/en

IEEE: Copy

A. Shahgoli, “Evaluating the Opinions of Opponents of Religious Science (Based on Abdul Karim Soroush Ideas),” KNOWLEDGE STUDIES IN THE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY, vol. 24, no. 2 (83) , pp. 331–352, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/388411/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops