Criticisms and Damages of

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

EBRAHIMPOUR A.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: KNOWLEDGE STUDIES IN THE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY Year:2021 | Volume:25 | Issue:1 (86) Page(s): 271-302

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

505

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Criticisms and Damages of "Study of (Social) Currents" And their Typology

Author(s)

EBRAHIMPOUR A. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

social currentQ1

currentologyQ1

currents studiesQ1

studies of (social) currentsQ1

criticisms of currentologyQ1

damages of currentologyQ1

tomato fallacyQ1

Abstract

Aim: The "Currentological" approach to historical, intellectual, cultural and religious information is prevalent. Also, this is a new theoretical literature. Accordingly, the purpose of this article is to identify the criticisms and harms of "Study of social currents (Currentology)" literature. Method: This article is written using a descriptive-analytical method and using library resources. Results: Nine essential dangers threaten "Study of social currents". And these criticisms are generally categorized into seven titles, Titles that will fall into three categories: basic, construction, and orientation. Based on epistemological roots, nine injuries can be typologically refered to as: 1. Basic Criticisms, 2. Construction critiques of the product, 3. Construction critiques of the method. Conclusion: In order to reinforce "Currentology" as Theory-Method, it is necessary to analyze its damages and respond to its criticisms. The etymology of criticisms and Responding to criticism with Analytical approach, pave the way for this. Currentology researchers need to pay attention to these nine important damages in "Currentological" products. Among them, The Cognitive Fallacy is noteworthy due to its prevalence and deep damage.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

EBRAHIMPOUR, A.. (2021). Criticisms and Damages of "Study of (Social) Currents" And their Typology. KNOWLEDGE STUDIES IN THE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY, 25(1 (86) ), 271-302. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/389613/en

Vancouver: Copy

EBRAHIMPOUR A.. Criticisms and Damages of "Study of (Social) Currents" And their Typology. KNOWLEDGE STUDIES IN THE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY[Internet]. 2021;25(1 (86) ):271-302. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/389613/en

IEEE: Copy

A. EBRAHIMPOUR, “Criticisms and Damages of "Study of (Social) Currents" And their Typology,” KNOWLEDGE STUDIES IN THE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY, vol. 25, no. 1 (86) , pp. 271–302, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/389613/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops