EVALUATION OF MIDWIFERY STUDENTS IN LABOR AND DELIVERY TRAINING: COMPARING TWO METHODS OF LOGBOOK AND CHECKLIST

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

AZH N.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Iranian Journal of Medical Education Year:2006 | Volume:6 | Issue:2 (16) Page(s): 123-128

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,385

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EVALUATION OF MIDWIFERY STUDENTS IN LABOR AND DELIVERY TRAINING: COMPARING TWO METHODS OF LOGBOOK AND CHECKLIST

Author(s)

AZH N. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

EVALUATIONQ2

TRAININGQ2

DELIVERYQ2

MIDWIFERY STUDENTQ2

LOGBOOKQ2

Abstract

Introduction: Different EVALUATION methods have been introduced for evaluating clinical skills. Using checklist and LOGBOOK are common methods in clinical units. The purpose of this study was to compare LOGBOOK and checklist as the means for evaluating MIDWIFERY STUDENTs in labor and DELIVERY TRAINING. Methods: This pre-experimental study was performed in Hazrat Zaynab Nursing and Midwifery School affiliated to Gilan University of Medical Sciences in the first semester of 2005. The study sample included all midwifery senior students (n=21). In order to record students’ daily scores, the students and their instructors were provided with a LOGBOOK including all the skills they were supposed to acquire. The instructors checked all students’ activities using a checklist at the end of semester, while at the same time, the instructors and students had to evaluate and mark any daily activity, using the LOGBOOK. The data was analyzed by SPSS software using frequency distribution, mean, standard deviation and t-test. Results: The mean and standard deviation of the scores recorded using the LOGBOOK and checklist were 16.33±.77 and 17.88±.41, respectively, which had a significant difference. At the beginning, all students were completely satisfied with the new method of EVALUATION, but after receiving the results, their satisfaction rate decreased to 85.71%. The students had significantly more satisfaction with LOGBOOK. Conclusion: Using LOGBOOK provided a more objective EVALUATION and led to more students’ satisfaction. However, using LOGBOOK requires more studies and revisions in other university centers.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

AZH, N.. (2006). EVALUATION OF MIDWIFERY STUDENTS IN LABOR AND DELIVERY TRAINING: COMPARING TWO METHODS OF LOGBOOK AND CHECKLIST. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, 6(2 (16)), 123-128. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/400671/en

Vancouver: Copy

AZH N.. EVALUATION OF MIDWIFERY STUDENTS IN LABOR AND DELIVERY TRAINING: COMPARING TWO METHODS OF LOGBOOK AND CHECKLIST. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION[Internet]. 2006;6(2 (16)):123-128. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/400671/en

IEEE: Copy

N. AZH, “EVALUATION OF MIDWIFERY STUDENTS IN LABOR AND DELIVERY TRAINING: COMPARING TWO METHODS OF LOGBOOK AND CHECKLIST,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, vol. 6, no. 2 (16), pp. 123–128, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/400671/en

Related Journal Papers