مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

31,689
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF THE EFFECT OF BETADINE AND WATER IN EPISIOTOMY WOUND HEALING

Pages

  80-85

Abstract

 History and Objectives: Considering the role of EPISIOTOMY in normal parturituion and the existence of different views on its sterilization, this study was carried out on EPISIOTOMY wound HEALING in referrals of Ziaian hospital in 1998. Material and Methods: The clinical trial strategy of this study was conducted on 100 cases. They were randomly divided into BETADINE (n = 50) and WATER (n = 50) groups and were similar regarding age, weight to height ratio, health status, head periphery, labor duration, number of sutures, and type of method. The efficacy was determined according to wound HEALING, redness, infection, and suture absorption at first, fifth, and tenth days post-operation. Results: Patients were similar regarding personal, sociological, and disorder status. Swelling less than 1Cm at first and fifth days was 56% and 60% in BETADINE group and 46% and 62% in WATER group. Swelling less than 1Cm at tenth day was 68% in BETADINE group and 40% in WATER group. Redness less than 3 mm was 60%, 46%, and 68% respectively, but it was 60%, 38%, and 66% in WATER group. Absorption of skin stitches at tenth day was 46% in BETADINE group and 52% in WATER group. There were no signs of wound opening and infection in both groups. There were no significant differences between the above-mentioned criteria. Conclusion and Recommendations: BETADINE has no effect on wound HEALING after EPISIOTOMY and there is no indication for its usage.  

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    TORK ZAHRANI, SH., AMIR ALI AKBARI, S., & VALAEI, NASER. (2002). COMPARISON OF THE EFFECT OF BETADINE AND WATER IN EPISIOTOMY WOUND HEALING. FEYZ, 5(20), 80-85. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/40695/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    TORK ZAHRANI SH., AMIR ALI AKBARI S., VALAEI NASER. COMPARISON OF THE EFFECT OF BETADINE AND WATER IN EPISIOTOMY WOUND HEALING. FEYZ[Internet]. 2002;5(20):80-85. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/40695/en

    IEEE: Copy

    SH. TORK ZAHRANI, S. AMIR ALI AKBARI, and NASER VALAEI, “COMPARISON OF THE EFFECT OF BETADINE AND WATER IN EPISIOTOMY WOUND HEALING,” FEYZ, vol. 5, no. 20, pp. 80–85, 2002, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/40695/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top