Evaluation and comparison of Image J and GIAS softwares with mechanical sieving in automatic particle-size distributions

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KHOSRAVI F.; TAZEH M.; KALANTARI S.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Arid Biome Year:2020 | Volume:9 | Issue:2 Page(s): 29-42

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

744

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Evaluation and comparison of Image J and GIAS softwares with mechanical sieving in automatic particle-size distributions

Author(s)

KHOSRAVI F. | TAZEH M. | KALANTARI S. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Desert pavementQ1

pedimentQ1

Image ProcessingQ2

SortingQ1

YazdQ2

Abstract

Particle-size and their distribution are important in various sciences such as: agricultural, natural resources, and even engineering and medical engineering. Using mechanical sieves requires considerable cost and time. The purpose of this study was to investigate the capability of Image Processing techniques for Desert pavement. Thus, random sampling of Desert pavement was carried out in bare and epandage pediments. Samples were transferred to the laboratory and was grading using standard sieve series. The collected samples taken were also photographed. Photos were analyzed using Image Processing and Analysis in Java and Geological Image Analysis Softwares. Then the results of the software were compared with the values measured by the sieve series. Results, show that the values obtained for particle aggregation using Image j software have a correlation of 93% in the epandage pediment particles and 96% in the bare pediments with mechanical sieve. Results of correlation between mechanical sieving and GIAS software in epandage pediment have an average correlation of 91% and in bare pediment has a correlation of 96%. It can be concluded that the use of these softwares can be a good substitute for mechanical sieve in particle size distribution. Using the results of this study can be effective in reducing cost and time in perform grading.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

KHOSRAVI, F., TAZEH, M., & KALANTARI, S.. (2020). Evaluation and comparison of Image J and GIAS softwares with mechanical sieving in automatic particle-size distributions. ARID BIOM SCIENTIFIC AND RESEARCH JOURNAL, 9(2 ), 29-42. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/407567/en

Vancouver: Copy

KHOSRAVI F., TAZEH M., KALANTARI S.. Evaluation and comparison of Image J and GIAS softwares with mechanical sieving in automatic particle-size distributions. ARID BIOM SCIENTIFIC AND RESEARCH JOURNAL[Internet]. 2020;9(2 ):29-42. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/407567/en

IEEE: Copy

F. KHOSRAVI, M. TAZEH, and S. KALANTARI, “Evaluation and comparison of Image J and GIAS softwares with mechanical sieving in automatic particle-size distributions,” ARID BIOM SCIENTIFIC AND RESEARCH JOURNAL, vol. 9, no. 2 , pp. 29–42, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/407567/en

Related Journal Papers