The Jurisprudence Sentence for Euthanasia

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

RAHMANI MOHAMMAD; Zarvandi Nafiseh; ABDOLJABARI MORTEZA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Research on Religion and Health Year:2018 | Volume:4 | Issue:4 Page(s): 104-117

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,647

Download:

892

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

The Jurisprudence Sentence for Euthanasia

Author(s)

RAHMANI MOHAMMAD | Zarvandi Nafiseh | ABDOLJABARI MORTEZA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Dispositive ruleQ2

EuthanasiaQ2

Imperative ruleQ2

RetaliationQ2

Self-killingQ2

Self-preservationQ2

SuicideQ2

Abstract

Background and Objective: Today, instead of preserving the health and life of people in some health centers, under the pretext of pity, the patients with difficult-to-cure diseases are suggested to accelerate selective death. Euthanasia dates back to ancient Roma and is one of the controversial topics discussed in different legal and jurisprudential aspects in academic circles. With the intent of explaining the jurisprudence sentence for Euthanasia, alongside proposing some primary topics, in this article we have tried to introduce a new category based on an effective criterion in the jurisprudence sentence unlike the common categories in scientific circles. Method: This library research is descriptive-analytical for which the articles of years between 1996 and 1997 were studied and reviewed. The procedure was as follows: keywords such as Euthanasia, Self-killing, Retaliation, Suicide, Self-preservation, and imperative and Dispositive rule were searched; then, the Qur`an and the books with jurisprudential and deductive themes such as Fikh va Hoghoogh-e-Tahaffozi by Ayat-Allah Sistani, Vasael Al-Shiea and Mostadrak were used. After analysis, the findings were taught and discussed in 10 sessions of the Hawza classes. All ethical issues were observed in this study and the researchers declared no conflict of interests. Results: The overall eight types of Euthanasia and their subcategories are classified into three general major categories: a) Three of them are the case of intentional murdering and Imperative rule of prohibition as well as Dispositive rule of Retaliation. b) One of them is the case of general suicidal that has only imperative prohibition. c) Four of them are the case of general necessity of Self-preservation, leaving which has imperative prohibition, and doesn`t have Dispositive rule due to Self-killing. Conclusion: All of the eight forms of Euthanasia are prohibited and we recommend that instead of this, revival be tried. This requires conducting studies to find treatment for difficult-to-cure diseases.

Cites

The Role of Quranic Education Methods in Mental Health and Tendency to Addiction in Three Areas of Deterrence, Support and Supervision

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

RAHMANI, MOHAMMAD, Zarvandi, Nafiseh, & ABDOLJABARI, MORTEZA. (2018). The Jurisprudence Sentence for Euthanasia. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON RELIGION AND HEALTH, 4(4 ), 104-117. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/407957/en

Vancouver: Copy

RAHMANI MOHAMMAD, Zarvandi Nafiseh, ABDOLJABARI MORTEZA. The Jurisprudence Sentence for Euthanasia. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON RELIGION AND HEALTH[Internet]. 2018;4(4 ):104-117. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/407957/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMAD RAHMANI, Nafiseh Zarvandi, and MORTEZA ABDOLJABARI, “The Jurisprudence Sentence for Euthanasia,” JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON RELIGION AND HEALTH, vol. 4, no. 4 , pp. 104–117, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/407957/en

Related Journal Papers