A Critique of Schopenhover's View on Authority

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

AHMADI FATEMEH; ASGARI MASOUD

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Metaphysical Investigations Year:2021 | Volume:1 | Issue:2 Page(s): 109-133

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

260

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A Critique of Schopenhover's View on Authority

Author(s)

AHMADI FATEMEH | ASGARI MASOUD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Schopenhauer

Morality

Will

Principle of Sufficient Reason

Liberum Arbitrium

Necessity

Abstract

Schopenhauer believes in his metaphsics that everything in the world as determined by the Will, under the Principle of Sufficient Reason and the time and the place, and necessarily become objective. Naturally, the human Will as the moral foundation should follow the Principle of Sufficient Reason and objectivity Will necessarily, In this case, the fundamental moral Schopenhauer is excluded because the ethics need to freedom and stay out of the realm of the Principle of Sufficient Reason. He goes to side separation nomen and phenomen that resolve this obstacle with establish term Liberum Arbitrium indiffentiae and attribute liberty to nomen; while human Will as the base of Morality located in realm phenomen and under the Principle of Sufficient Reason and the time and the place. Therefore followes of Necessity and is not free. Other subject is that Schopenhauer believes that human Will is freedom capacity being and substance not capacity act; while Liberum Arbitrium prove in Morality realm through freedom in acts. Therefore Schopenhauer problem doesn't solve with mere accept freedom capacity being and substance.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

AHMADI, FATEMEH, & ASGARI, MASOUD. (2021). A Critique of Schopenhover's View on Authority. METAPHYSICAL INVESTIGATIONS, 1(2 ), 109-133. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/410220/en

Vancouver: Copy

AHMADI FATEMEH, ASGARI MASOUD. A Critique of Schopenhover's View on Authority. METAPHYSICAL INVESTIGATIONS[Internet]. 2021;1(2 ):109-133. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/410220/en

IEEE: Copy

FATEMEH AHMADI, and MASOUD ASGARI, “A Critique of Schopenhover's View on Authority,” METAPHYSICAL INVESTIGATIONS, vol. 1, no. 2 , pp. 109–133, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/410220/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops