مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

249
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Adam’ s Vicious Circle Argument against Molinism and Flint’ s Critique of It.

Pages

  59-86

Abstract

 More than anything else, Molinism seeks to prove the compatibility between providence and free will. One of the current debates is what God’ s knowledge is and its limits. That is, if we accept middle knowledge, how can we believe in two things; First, the freedom and second, the Compatibility of free will with divine providence. Molinism’ s suggested solution is middle knowledge. Based on the Middle Knowledge, the counterfactual that corresponds to a free action is the solution to this problem. Asking the truth validity of these conditionals, Adams argues that middle knowledge is the begging the question and absurd. Because the analysis of middle knowledge tells us that despite the efforts of Molinism, freedom is not proven. On the other hand, in a detailed critique, Flint dismisses Adamschr('39') claim. In this article, as its title suggests, first Adamschr('39') argument and then Flintchr('39')s critique of it are discussed in detail.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

  • No record.

    • Cite

    APA: Copy

    Rasoulipour, Rasoul, & Baghdadi, Sara. (2021). Adam’ s Vicious Circle Argument against Molinism and Flint’ s Critique of It.. METAPHYSICAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2(3 ), 59-86. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/410651/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Rasoulipour Rasoul, Baghdadi Sara. Adam’ s Vicious Circle Argument against Molinism and Flint’ s Critique of It.. METAPHYSICAL INVESTIGATIONS[Internet]. 2021;2(3 ):59-86. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/410651/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Rasoul Rasoulipour, and Sara Baghdadi, “Adam’ s Vicious Circle Argument against Molinism and Flint’ s Critique of It.,” METAPHYSICAL INVESTIGATIONS, vol. 2, no. 3 , pp. 59–86, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/410651/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button