مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

846
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF INTRAOBSERVER AND INTEROBSERVER RELIABILITY BETWEEN THE LENKE AND KING CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS FOR ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS

Pages

  73-80

Abstract

 Background: In spite of many advantages in LENKE CLASSIFICATION of adolescent IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS, the latest study of Richards et al showed that the KING CLASSIFICATION is better than had been reported recently and the LENKE CLASSIFICATION system of adolescent IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS is less reliable than previously reported.Methods: In this study, we performed a multi-surgeon comparison of these two classification systems. After teaching and discussing all available data of these classification systems with four spine surgeons, a pilot classification was performed. Then, they independently evaluated preoperative radiographs (standing posteroanterior, lateral, and two supine side-bending views) of 99 patients with adolescent IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS. The results were determined by calculating the average percentage of intraobserver and interobserver agreement. Reliability was quantified using kappa statistics.Findings: The KING CLASSIFICATION demonstrated good intraobserver and interobserver reliability, with an intraobserver agreement of 85.8% (kappa coefficient, 0.80). Interobserver percentage of agreement averaged 80.8% (kappa coefficient, 0.74). The complete LENKE CLASSIFICATION, combining curve type, lumbar modifier, and sagittal thoracic modifier, demonstrated good reliability for both intraobserver and interobserver measurements. The intraobserver percentage of agreement averaged 85.8% (kappa coefficient, 0.82). The interobserver percentage of agreement averaged 80.8% (kappa coefficient, 0.77).Conclusion: In this study, with each investigator performing the radiographic measurements, the King and LENKE CLASSIFICATIONs were almost similar (the LENKE CLASSIFICATION had slightly better results). Such better results might be due to more training of this complex classification system. So, because of greater coverage of IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS curve and usefulness of LENKE CLASSIFICATION system, we prefer using this classification system in our center.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    SADAT, S.M.M., ZAHTAB, M.J., & NIKNAFS, F.. (2007). COMPARISON OF INTRAOBSERVER AND INTEROBSERVER RELIABILITY BETWEEN THE LENKE AND KING CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS FOR ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL COUNCIL OF I.R.I., 25(1), 73-80. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/41129/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    SADAT S.M.M., ZAHTAB M.J., NIKNAFS F.. COMPARISON OF INTRAOBSERVER AND INTEROBSERVER RELIABILITY BETWEEN THE LENKE AND KING CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS FOR ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL COUNCIL OF I.R.I.[Internet]. 2007;25(1):73-80. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/41129/en

    IEEE: Copy

    S.M.M. SADAT, M.J. ZAHTAB, and F. NIKNAFS, “COMPARISON OF INTRAOBSERVER AND INTEROBSERVER RELIABILITY BETWEEN THE LENKE AND KING CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS FOR ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS,” JOURNAL OF MEDICAL COUNCIL OF I.R.I., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 73–80, 2007, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/41129/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button