A Critical Assessment of Epistemological and Mutual-Reverse Arguments for Intellectual Moral Good and Bad

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Taleghani Sayyedali; RAFIEI HOSSEIN

Educational Videos and Scientific Workshops

Scientific Information Database

ISSN: 2588-4824

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Philosophy and Kalam Year:2020 | Volume:52 | Issue:2 Page(s): 271-287

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

254

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A Critical Assessment of Epistemological and Mutual-Reverse Arguments for Intellectual Moral Good and Bad

Author(s)

Taleghani Sayyedali | RAFIEI HOSSEIN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

epistemological argument on intellectual moral goodQ1

badQ1

epistemology of moral goodQ2

badQ1

mutual-reverse argument on intellectual moral goodQ1

badQ1

Nasir al-Din al-TusiQ1

ontology of moral goodQ1

badQ1

Abstract

The imami-shi'i philosopher and theologian, Nasir al-Din al-Tusi in his great and influential work, Tajrid al-iʿ tiqad, had advanced three arguments for what is commonly called "intellectual moral good and bad" (husn wa qubh 'aqli). Two of these three arguments are what we call respectively: "epistemological argument" and "mutual-reverse argument". Both of the conclusions and premises of the arguments are ambiguous and open to more than one interpretation. This paper separates epistemological and ontological aspects of each argument and after advancing their logical structures assess each one. On authors' opinion none of them can fulfill neither to prove the belief of people of justice ('Adliyya) nor invalidate their opponents' theory.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Taleghani, Sayyedali, & RAFIEI, HOSSEIN. (2020). A Critical Assessment of Epistemological and Mutual-Reverse Arguments for Intellectual Moral Good and Bad. FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA), 52(2 ), 271-287. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/411423/en

Vancouver: Copy

Taleghani Sayyedali, RAFIEI HOSSEIN. A Critical Assessment of Epistemological and Mutual-Reverse Arguments for Intellectual Moral Good and Bad. FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA)[Internet]. 2020;52(2 ):271-287. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/411423/en

IEEE: Copy

Sayyedali Taleghani, and HOSSEIN RAFIEI, “A Critical Assessment of Epistemological and Mutual-Reverse Arguments for Intellectual Moral Good and Bad,” FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA), vol. 52, no. 2 , pp. 271–287, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/411423/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops

Download

Move to top

وبگردی