Evaluating the Attribution of Buridan and Barcan Formulas to Ibn Sina in Sinavi Logic

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

FALLAHI ASADOLLAH

Educational Videos and Scientific Workshops

Scientific Information Database

ISSN: 2588-4824

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Philosophy and Kalam Year:2019 | Volume:51 | Issue:2 Page(s): 261-278

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

369

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Evaluating the Attribution of Buridan and Barcan Formulas to Ibn Sina in Sinavi Logic

Author(s)

FALLAHI ASADOLLAH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

AvicennaQ2

Barcan FormulaQ1

Buridan FormulaQ1

KhunajiQ2

Modal LogicQ1

Abstract

In modern Modal Logic, the relations between modality and quantification are shown by Buridan and Barcan Formulas. Zia Movahed, Lotfollah Nabavi and Mahdi Azimi have shown Ibn Sina’ s anticipation of the formulas. In this paper, I show that Ibn Sina anticipated just in de re and de dicto modalities and his points in Shifa and Isharat do not verify the attribution of the formulas to him. Even his followers, beginning from Bahmanyar to Fakhr Al-Din Razi, have not deducted the formulas from his writings. The first who stipulated the formulas was Afdal Al-Din Khunaji, who, as we shall show, denied them for the actualist reading of the quantifiers, and in his discussion of the formulas for the possibilist reading, there were some ambiguities, which are present in his commentators and his followers. Then came shams Al-Din Samarqandi and Qutb Al-Din Razi, who opposed Khunaji; so, we cannot attribute the belief in the formulas to Ibn Sina, nor his followers.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

FALLAHI, ASADOLLAH. (2019). Evaluating the Attribution of Buridan and Barcan Formulas to Ibn Sina in Sinavi Logic. FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA), 51(2 ), 261-278. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/411679/en

Vancouver: Copy

FALLAHI ASADOLLAH. Evaluating the Attribution of Buridan and Barcan Formulas to Ibn Sina in Sinavi Logic. FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA)[Internet]. 2019;51(2 ):261-278. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/411679/en

IEEE: Copy

ASADOLLAH FALLAHI, “Evaluating the Attribution of Buridan and Barcan Formulas to Ibn Sina in Sinavi Logic,” FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA), vol. 51, no. 2 , pp. 261–278, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/411679/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops

File Not Exists.

Move to top

وبگردی