COMPARISON OF PRECIPITATION AND DIRECT METHODS FOR HDL-C ASSAY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HEDAYATI MAHDI; DANESHPOUR M.A.S.; AZIM ZADEH I.; IZADI ARBABI S.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Research in Medicine Year:2007 | Volume:31 | Issue:3 Page(s): 285-287

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

1,197

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF PRECIPITATION AND DIRECT METHODS FOR HDL-C ASSAY

Author(s)

HEDAYATI MAHDI | DANESHPOUR M.A.S. | AZIM ZADEH I. | IZADI ARBABI S. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

HDL-CQ3

DIRECT METHODQ2

PRECIPITATION METHODQ3

Abstract

Background: HDL-C measurement is important in cardiovascular diseases evaluation. PRECIPITATION METHOD is common procedure in this measurement, but DIRECT METHOD widely used nowadays. The aim of the present study was to compare the results of the two aforementioned techniques and their correlation. Materials and methods: During August 2006, serum HDL-C of 212 subjects (98 male, 114 female with the mean age of 39±20 year) referring for Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study were determined by direct and PRECIPITATION METHODs simultaneously.Results: The HDL-C levels of the direct and PRECIPITATION METHODs were 43.5±10.2 and 45.2±10.9 mg/dl, respectively. DIRECT METHOD had 3.9% higher value results (P=0.000) and two methods had good correlation (r=0.943). Intraassay coefficient variation (CV) of precipitation and DIRECT METHOD were 5.6% and 3.3%, respectively. Assay time of DIRECT METHOD was half of PRECIPITATION METHOD and its cost was 3 folds higher.Conclusion: The study revealed that the results of direct HDL-C method had good correlation with the PRECIPITATION METHOD, its precision and speed was more acceptable. After moderating the price of DIRECT METHOD, it will be a good substitution for precipitating method.

Cites

FAMILIAL HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA IN TEHRAN LIPID AND GLUCOSE STUDY: A CROSS- SECTIONAL STUDY

References

Cite

APA: Copy

HEDAYATI, MAHDI, DANESHPOUR, M.A.S., AZIM ZADEH, I., & IZADI ARBABI, S.. (2007). COMPARISON OF PRECIPITATION AND DIRECT METHODS FOR HDL-C ASSAY. PAJOUHESH DAR PEZESHKI, 31(3), 285-287. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/41759/en

Vancouver: Copy

HEDAYATI MAHDI, DANESHPOUR M.A.S., AZIM ZADEH I., IZADI ARBABI S.. COMPARISON OF PRECIPITATION AND DIRECT METHODS FOR HDL-C ASSAY. PAJOUHESH DAR PEZESHKI[Internet]. 2007;31(3):285-287. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/41759/en

IEEE: Copy

MAHDI HEDAYATI, M.A.S. DANESHPOUR, I. AZIM ZADEH, and S. IZADI ARBABI, “COMPARISON OF PRECIPITATION AND DIRECT METHODS FOR HDL-C ASSAY,” PAJOUHESH DAR PEZESHKI, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 285–287, 2007, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/41759/en

Related Journal Papers