MERSILENE MESH VERSUS SCLERA AS A WRAPPING MATERIAL FOR ORBITAL IMPLANT

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KASAEI A.A.F.; PANJTANPANAH M.R.; SADEGHI TARI A.; TABATABAEI Z.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: BINA Year:2005 | Volume:10 | Issue:4 (40) Page(s): 443-447

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

917

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

MERSILENE MESH VERSUS SCLERA AS A WRAPPING MATERIAL FOR ORBITAL IMPLANT

Author(s)

KASAEI A.A.F. | PANJTANPANAH M.R. | SADEGHI TARI A. | TABATABAEI Z. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

HYDROXYAPATITEQ3

EXPOSUREQ3

MERSILENE MESHQ3

SCLERAQ3

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate EXPOSURE rate following wrapping HYDROXYAPATITE implant in MERSILENE MESH and donor SCLERA. Methods: In a prospective comparative interventional case-series 60 consecutive patients underwent primary HYDROXYAPATITE orbital implant wrapped in MERSILENE MESH or donor SCLERA. Results: Thirty patients (21 male and 10 female) underwent implantation with MERSILENE MESH and 30 patients (20 males and 10 females) with donor SCLERA. Average age at the time of surgery was 36.4 years (range, 10-77) in the MERSILENE MESH group and 28.5 years (range, 8-85) in the SCLERA group. The most frequent cause of enucleation in both groups was trauma (53.3% in MERSILENE MESH and %56.6 in SCLERAl group, respectively). After 10.4 months (range, 6-18) follow up there was no EXPOSURE in the MERSILENE MESH group; however after 9.4 months (range, 6-15) follow up in the SCLERA group one EXPOSURE was observed. There was no significant difference in EXPOSURE rate between the two groups.Conclusion: MERSILENE MESH should be considered as an alternative for donor SCLERA. It is readily available and avoids risk of disease transmission.

Cites

No record.

References

COMPLICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH HYDROXYAPATITE IMPLANT IN ENUCLEATION, EVISCERATION, AND SECONDARY IMPLANTATION

Cite

APA: Copy

KASAEI, A.A.F., PANJTANPANAH, M.R., SADEGHI TARI, A., & TABATABAEI, Z.. (2005). MERSILENE MESH VERSUS SCLERA AS A WRAPPING MATERIAL FOR ORBITAL IMPLANT. BINA, 10(4 (40)), 443-447. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/42459/en

Vancouver: Copy

KASAEI A.A.F., PANJTANPANAH M.R., SADEGHI TARI A., TABATABAEI Z.. MERSILENE MESH VERSUS SCLERA AS A WRAPPING MATERIAL FOR ORBITAL IMPLANT. BINA[Internet]. 2005;10(4 (40)):443-447. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/42459/en

IEEE: Copy

A.A.F. KASAEI, M.R. PANJTANPANAH, A. SADEGHI TARI, and Z. TABATABAEI, “MERSILENE MESH VERSUS SCLERA AS A WRAPPING MATERIAL FOR ORBITAL IMPLANT,” BINA, vol. 10, no. 4 (40), pp. 443–447, 2005, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/42459/en

Related Journal Papers