COMPARISON OF HIGHER-ORDER ABERRATIONS IN CONVENTIONAL VERSUS CUSTOMIZED ABLATION FOR PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KARIMIAN FARID; FEYZI SEPEHR; JAFARINASAB M.R.; FARDESMAEILPOUR N.; ANSARI S.; DOUZANDEH A.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: BINA Year:2010 | Volume:15 | Issue:3 (60) Page(s): 199-207

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

632

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF HIGHER-ORDER ABERRATIONS IN CONVENTIONAL VERSUS CUSTOMIZED ABLATION FOR PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY

Author(s)

Keywords

CONVENTIONALQ3

CUSTOMIZED PRKQ3

HOAQ3

ABERRATIONSQ3

Abstract

Purpose: To compare visual outcomes and changes in high-order ABERRATIONS (HOAs) following CONVENTIONAL versus customized photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Methods: In this clinical trial, 58 eyes of 29 patients underwent myopic PRK using the Technolas 217Z excimer machine. After comprehensive evaluation for refractive surgery, one eye of each participant randomly received CONVENTIONAL ablation (group 1) while customized treatment was performed in the fellow eye (group 2). Changes in postoperative visual acuity, cycloplegic refraction, and contrast sensitivity function (CSF), HOAs and subjective complaints of halos and glare were compared between the two groups. Results: Mean subject age was 26.7±6.0 years. Mean preoperative cycloplegic spherical equivalent refractive error and refractive astigmatism were -4.92±1.6 D and 0.91±1.0 D, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of preoperative HOAs and CSF. Mean follow-up period was 8.1±3.3 months. After the operation, total HOAs for 4 mm pupil was increased by 0.24±0.19 mm in group 1 and by 0.31±0.21 mm in group 2 (P<0.001). Corresponding figures for 6 mm pupil were 0.34±0.23 (range -0.08 to 0.75) and 0.52±0.32 (-0.04 to 1.43) mm respectively (P=0.03). The increase in postoperative HOAs was statistically significant in group 2 in the 6 mm zone (P=0.03) but not in the 4 mm zone (P=0.26). CSF was reduced in both groups, but there was no significant difference between the study groups in terms of postoperative CSF and subjective complaints.Conclusion: HOAs significantly increased after PRK using CONVENTIONAL and customized ablation. The increase in HOAs after customized ablation was significantly greater than that after CONVENTIONAL ablation.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

KARIMIAN, FARID, FEYZI, SEPEHR, JAFARINASAB, M.R., FARDESMAEILPOUR, N., ANSARI, S., & DOUZANDEH, A.. (2010). COMPARISON OF HIGHER-ORDER ABERRATIONS IN CONVENTIONAL VERSUS CUSTOMIZED ABLATION FOR PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY. BINA, 15(3 (60)), 199-207. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/42824/en

Vancouver: Copy

KARIMIAN FARID, FEYZI SEPEHR, JAFARINASAB M.R., FARDESMAEILPOUR N., ANSARI S., DOUZANDEH A.. COMPARISON OF HIGHER-ORDER ABERRATIONS IN CONVENTIONAL VERSUS CUSTOMIZED ABLATION FOR PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY. BINA[Internet]. 2010;15(3 (60)):199-207. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/42824/en

IEEE: Copy

FARID KARIMIAN, SEPEHR FEYZI, M.R. JAFARINASAB, N. FARDESMAEILPOUR, S. ANSARI, and A. DOUZANDEH, “COMPARISON OF HIGHER-ORDER ABERRATIONS IN CONVENTIONAL VERSUS CUSTOMIZED ABLATION FOR PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY,” BINA, vol. 15, no. 3 (60), pp. 199–207, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/42824/en

Related Journal Papers