COMPARISON OF INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE MEASUREMENT WITH THE NONCONTACT PULSAIR 3000 TONOMETER AND GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETER

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

RAZMJOU H.; RAZMJOU M.; TAVAKOLI MAHDI; AKHLAGHI M.R.; RISMANCHIAN A.; DEHGHANI A.R.; NASR ELAHI K.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: BINA Year:2009 | Volume:14 | Issue:4 (57) Page(s): 372-377

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,494

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE MEASUREMENT WITH THE NONCONTACT PULSAIR 3000 TONOMETER AND GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETER

Author(s)

Keywords

Not Registered.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement with Pulsair non-contact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT). Methods: In this cross-sectional study, during a complete ophthalmologic examination, each patient underwent Pulsair tonometry three times at 5 minutes intervals and then Goldmann tonometry at the same intervals. Mean IOP values were measured and analyzed. Results: We evaluated 458 eyes of 250 patients (138 males and 112 female subjects). Mean IOP was 19.45±9.04 mmHg with GAT and 20.11±8.42 mmHg with Pulsair (P=0.075). Correlation coefficient between the two methods was 0.96 (P= 0.004) and the mean difference (Pulsair-GAT) was 0.65±1.52 (confidence interval 95%, +3.5 to -2.29). With IOPs between 10-25mmHg, mean difference between the two methods was 0.49±1.23 (P= 0.32) mmHg, however it was -1.75±1.91 (P= 0.06) at IOPs over than 25 mm Hg. Conclusion: Pulsair tonometry has acceptable accuracy in comparison with GAT, especially in IOP ranging from 10 to 25 mmHg.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

RAZMJOU, H., RAZMJOU, M., TAVAKOLI, MAHDI, AKHLAGHI, M.R., RISMANCHIAN, A., DEHGHANI, A.R., & NASR ELAHI, K.. (2009). COMPARISON OF INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE MEASUREMENT WITH THE NONCONTACT PULSAIR 3000 TONOMETER AND GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETER. BINA, 14(4 (57)), 372-377. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/42955/en

Vancouver: Copy

RAZMJOU H., RAZMJOU M., TAVAKOLI MAHDI, AKHLAGHI M.R., RISMANCHIAN A., DEHGHANI A.R., NASR ELAHI K.. COMPARISON OF INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE MEASUREMENT WITH THE NONCONTACT PULSAIR 3000 TONOMETER AND GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETER. BINA[Internet]. 2009;14(4 (57)):372-377. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/42955/en

IEEE: Copy

H. RAZMJOU, M. RAZMJOU, MAHDI TAVAKOLI, M.R. AKHLAGHI, A. RISMANCHIAN, A.R. DEHGHANI, and K. NASR ELAHI, “COMPARISON OF INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE MEASUREMENT WITH THE NONCONTACT PULSAIR 3000 TONOMETER AND GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETER,” BINA, vol. 14, no. 4 (57), pp. 372–377, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/42955/en

Related Journal Papers