مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,226
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

DOES IVP METHOD HAS PRIORITY TO SONOGRAPHY IN DIAGNOSIS OF URETERAL STONES

Pages

  15-19

Abstract

 Background and purpose: Clinical symptoms of obstructive URETERAL STONEs are very disturbing. Infection, hematuria and renal insufficiency are its complications. In the recent decades IVP has been a selective standard method in diagnosis of the causes of ureteral colic. But in many cases there are contraindications and limitations in this procedure.The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of ULTRASOUND and IVP in diagnosis of URETERAL STONEs as a common cause of ureteral colic.Materials and methods: This was a prospective study in order to determine the diagnostic efficiency of two instruments. Total of 41 Patients with mean age of 34.4 years were referred by urologists to this center from february to july 1999.Sonography was performed by a radiologist and interpretation of IVP was done by another radiologist. Results: Forty one Patients were taken in to study, but 27 Patients with URETERAL STONEs were diagnosed. Sensitivity and specificity of sonography in diagnosis of URETERAL STONEs were 88.8% and 92.8% respectively this method showed that PPV=96% and NPV=81.2%. In case of IVP, the sensitivity and specificity was 96.2% and 92.8% respectively, PPV=96.2% and NPV=92.8%. Conclusion: This study reveals that, sensitivity and specificity of sonography for the diagnosis of URETERAL STONEs can compete completely with IVP. Hence, considering the contraindications of IVP, it can be proposed as a primary diagnostic method.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    ABDI, R.A., YOONESI ROSTAMY, M., HESAMI ROSTAMY, J., & KOUSARIAN, S.A.S.. (2002). DOES IVP METHOD HAS PRIORITY TO SONOGRAPHY IN DIAGNOSIS OF URETERAL STONES. JOURNAL OF MAZANDARAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 12(35), 15-19. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/44431/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    ABDI R.A., YOONESI ROSTAMY M., HESAMI ROSTAMY J., KOUSARIAN S.A.S.. DOES IVP METHOD HAS PRIORITY TO SONOGRAPHY IN DIAGNOSIS OF URETERAL STONES. JOURNAL OF MAZANDARAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2002;12(35):15-19. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/44431/en

    IEEE: Copy

    R.A. ABDI, M. YOONESI ROSTAMY, J. HESAMI ROSTAMY, and S.A.S. KOUSARIAN, “DOES IVP METHOD HAS PRIORITY TO SONOGRAPHY IN DIAGNOSIS OF URETERAL STONES,” JOURNAL OF MAZANDARAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, vol. 12, no. 35, pp. 15–19, 2002, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/44431/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top