COMPARISON OF TWO DIFFERENT INSTRUMENTATION METHODS ON
CANAL DIAMETER AND REMAINED DENTIN IN POST ROOM SPACE OF MOLAR MAIN CANAL

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ASGARY SAEID

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences Year:2001 | Volume:11 | Issue:31 Page(s): 31-35

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

939

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF TWO DIFFERENT INSTRUMENTATION METHODS ON CANAL DIAMETER AND REMAINED DENTIN IN POST ROOM SPACE OF MOLAR MAIN CANAL

Author(s)

ASGARY SAEID | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CANAL DIAMETER AND WIDTHQ4

STEP BACK TECHNIQUE (SB)Q4

PASSIVE STEP BACK TECHNIQUE (PSB)Q4

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Since molar main canal preparation faciliates a good apical obturation and provides necessary room for "post" placement. This study focuses on the outcome of two different instrumentation methods in canal diameter and remained dentin.Materials and Methods: Main canal of 60 upper and lower molars prepared in 4 groups using step back (SB) and passive step back (PSB) techniques gross sections were made in molar roots in 5, 7, 9, 11 millimeters from apical foramina and measurements were done.Results: CANAL DIAMETER AND WIDTH of remained dentin of the instrumented canals were measured by two methods. Results show no significant difference between the methods, using "T test".Conclusion: Both SB and PSB methods are recommended considering "Post" room preparation. Regarding minimal remained dentin in danger zone, care must be taken not to reduce the dentin width to less than one millimeter and not to produce strip perforation.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ASGARY, SAEID. (2001). COMPARISON OF TWO DIFFERENT INSTRUMENTATION METHODS ON CANAL DIAMETER AND REMAINED DENTIN IN POST ROOM SPACE OF MOLAR MAIN CANAL . JOURNAL OF MAZANDARAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 11(31), 31-35. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/46096/en

Vancouver: Copy

ASGARY SAEID. COMPARISON OF TWO DIFFERENT INSTRUMENTATION METHODS ON CANAL DIAMETER AND REMAINED DENTIN IN POST ROOM SPACE OF MOLAR MAIN CANAL . JOURNAL OF MAZANDARAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2001;11(31):31-35. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/46096/en

IEEE: Copy

SAEID ASGARY, “COMPARISON OF TWO DIFFERENT INSTRUMENTATION METHODS ON CANAL DIAMETER AND REMAINED DENTIN IN POST ROOM SPACE OF MOLAR MAIN CANAL ,” JOURNAL OF MAZANDARAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, vol. 11, no. 31, pp. 31–35, 2001, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/46096/en

Related Journal Papers