THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE SUPREME LARYNGEAL MASK COMPARED WITH THE CONVENTIONAL LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MOSHTAGHION SEYED HOSSEIN; BEHDAD SHOKOUFEH; DEHGHANI MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN; HAJIESMAEILI MOHAMMAD REZA; JOMEH HOSSEIN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: MEDICAL JOURNAL OF TABRIZ UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES Year:2012 | Volume:33 | Issue:6 Page(s): 95-100

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

949

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE SUPREME LARYNGEAL MASK COMPARED WITH THE CONVENTIONAL LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY

Author(s)

Keywords

LARYNGEAL MASKQ2

CONVENTIONALQ2

SUPREMEQ3

CLINICAL TRIALQ3

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The LARYNGEAL MASK airway SUPREME (LMA-S) is a new airway device designed to minimize the risk of aspiration. We studied the success rates of the LMA-S insertion and the incidence of any complications compared with the CONVENTIONAL LMA in orthopedic surgery patients with normal airways.Materials and Methods: In a randomized CLINICAL TRIAL, 122 patients undergoing elective lower limb orthopedic surgery were studied in two study and control groups. Airway management in the study and control groups was with LMA-S and CONVENTIONAL LMA, respectively. The collected data including the success rate of insertion and ventilation, and the incidence of any complications associated with the use of the device were analyzed between two groups.Results: The LMA-S was easily inserted in 96.8% of 62 patients in the study group and in 81.7% of 60 patients in the control group (P=0.02). Nausea was observed in 6.5% of the study group and 20% in the control group (P=0.02). There was no difference in incidence of postoperative sore throat and abdominal pain between the two studied groups (P>0.05). The mean sealing pressure significantly differed between two groups (P=0.04).Conclusion: Our report indicates that the LMA-S is a valuable addition to airway devices for patients with normal airways.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

Related Journal Papers