مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,394
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISION OF 64-SLICE MDCT AND INVASIVE ANGIOGRAPHY IN DIAGNOSIS OF SIGNIFICANT CORONARY ARTERY STENOSIS

Pages

  33-37

Abstract

 Background and Objectives: Introduction of 64-Slice Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT has resulted in a great improvement in the non-invasive coronary artery imaging.Materials and Methods: In a retrospective cross sectional study we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of 64-Slice MDCT versus invasive coronary angiography in patients with the suspected coronary artery disease who underwent both MDCT and invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Computed tomography angiography and invasive coronary angiography findings of each coronary segment were compared to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of MDCT in the detection of significant lesions (³50% diameter decrease stenosis or total occlusion with no luminal flow shown).Results: a total of 125 patients were evaluated with both methods. In per patient assessment, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of MDCT were 97.6%, 85.2%, 95.2% and 92% respectively. These values in per vessel evaluation were 86.3%, 92.2%, 86.8%, and 92.2%, and also corresponding values in per segment evaluation were 69.8%, 94.8%, 69%, and 95% respectively.Conclusion: We concluded that coronary angiography with 64-Slice MDCT has high diagnostic performance for evaluation of SIGNIFICANT CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE (CAD) in patients with the suspected coronary artery disease but cannot replace conventional coronary angiography at present time.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    DAGHIGHI, MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN, JAVAD RASHID, REZA, SALEHY, AHAD, GHAFARI, SAMAD, POUREISA, MASOUD, & ABDKARIMI, MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN. (2010). COMPARISION OF 64-SLICE MDCT AND INVASIVE ANGIOGRAPHY IN DIAGNOSIS OF SIGNIFICANT CORONARY ARTERY STENOSIS. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF TABRIZ UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 32(4), 33-37. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/46811/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    DAGHIGHI MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN, JAVAD RASHID REZA, SALEHY AHAD, GHAFARI SAMAD, POUREISA MASOUD, ABDKARIMI MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN. COMPARISION OF 64-SLICE MDCT AND INVASIVE ANGIOGRAPHY IN DIAGNOSIS OF SIGNIFICANT CORONARY ARTERY STENOSIS. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF TABRIZ UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2010;32(4):33-37. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/46811/en

    IEEE: Copy

    MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN DAGHIGHI, REZA JAVAD RASHID, AHAD SALEHY, SAMAD GHAFARI, MASOUD POUREISA, and MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN ABDKARIMI, “COMPARISION OF 64-SLICE MDCT AND INVASIVE ANGIOGRAPHY IN DIAGNOSIS OF SIGNIFICANT CORONARY ARTERY STENOSIS,” MEDICAL JOURNAL OF TABRIZ UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 33–37, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/46811/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button