COMPARISON OF SURGICAL COMPLICATION BETWEEN SINGLE PORT VERSUS QUADRA PORT LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

BARBAND ALIREZA; SOROUSH MOHAMMAD; GHOJAZADEH MORTEZA; SHIKHDAVODEI NEGAR

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: MEDICAL JOURNAL OF TABRIZ UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES Year:2013 | Volume:35 | Issue:3 Page(s): 26-31

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

956

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF SURGICAL COMPLICATION BETWEEN SINGLE PORT VERSUS QUADRA PORT LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY

Author(s)

BARBAND ALIREZA | SOROUSH MOHAMMAD | GHOJAZADEH MORTEZA | SHIKHDAVODEI NEGAR | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CHOLECYSTECTOMYQ2

LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERYQ3

SINGLE INCISIONQ2

QUADRA PORTQ2

Abstract

Backgrounds and Objectives: With the ever-increasing domain of medical technology and production of new tools in the last 30 years, the operational field of laparoscopy has expanded to the extent that few abdominal surgeries are not performed through this technique. Evidently, new laparoscopic techniques are in the way of reducing harm to patients, post-operative pain and improvement of many other parameters. Materials and Methods: 60 candidates of laparoscopic CHOLECYSTECTOMY, who met inclusion criteria, were evaluated in a clinical trial in two groups (case group: using single port; control group: using quadraport). The outcome of the two operational techniques was compared through comparison of post-operative pain severity, hospital stay and many other factors.Results: From all the patients, 58 (96.7%) were female and only 2 (3.3%) were male. The mean age of the patients was 47.2±11.9 in the age range of 29 to 70 years. The evaluation of the results of the multiple measurements plan showed that pain severity was significantly reduced in both groups (P<0.001) with no significant difference between the two groups (P=0.12). The mean duration of hospital stay in group A was 2.90±0.5 and 2.6±0.6 in group B which was also significantly different (P=0.03).Conclusion: Considering the longer hospital stay, duration of operation and post-operative analgesic use in single port laparoscopic CHOLECYSTECTOMY, it seems that this technique has no priority upon the standard quadroport technique.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

BARBAND, ALIREZA, SOROUSH, MOHAMMAD, GHOJAZADEH, MORTEZA, & SHIKHDAVODEI, NEGAR. (2013). COMPARISON OF SURGICAL COMPLICATION BETWEEN SINGLE PORT VERSUS QUADRA PORT LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF TABRIZ UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 35(3), 26-31. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/47532/en

Vancouver: Copy

BARBAND ALIREZA, SOROUSH MOHAMMAD, GHOJAZADEH MORTEZA, SHIKHDAVODEI NEGAR. COMPARISON OF SURGICAL COMPLICATION BETWEEN SINGLE PORT VERSUS QUADRA PORT LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF TABRIZ UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2013;35(3):26-31. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/47532/en

IEEE: Copy

ALIREZA BARBAND, MOHAMMAD SOROUSH, MORTEZA GHOJAZADEH, and NEGAR SHIKHDAVODEI, “COMPARISON OF SURGICAL COMPLICATION BETWEEN SINGLE PORT VERSUS QUADRA PORT LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY,” MEDICAL JOURNAL OF TABRIZ UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 26–31, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/47532/en

Related Journal Papers