POST-CESAREAN PAIN IN CLOSURE VERSUS NON-CLOSURE OF PARIETAL PERITONEUM

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HAJSEIDJAVADI E.S.; RASEKH F.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Inflammatory Diseases Year:2006 | Volume:10 | Issue:3 (40) Page(s): 45-48

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,289

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

POST-CESAREAN PAIN IN CLOSURE VERSUS NON-CLOSURE OF PARIETAL PERITONEUM

Author(s)

HAJSEIDJAVADI E.S. | RASEKH F. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CESAREAN SECTIONQ3

PAINQ2

PERITONEUMQ3

LABORQ3

SPINAL ANESTHESIAQ2

Abstract

Background: Management of PAIN after CESAREAN SECTION not only brings comfort for patients but reduces the cost and duration of hospitalization.Objective: This study was performed to compare post-cesarean PAIN between two techniques of closure and non-closure of parietal PERITONEUM.Methods: This was a double blind clinical trial in which 160 pregnant women visited in Kosar hospital during the period from October 2003 to May 2004 were selected. All cases were operated under SPINAL ANESTHESIA. A pfannenstiel incision of skin and lower segment of uterus was employed in all cases. The patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. In one group, parietal PERITONEUM was closed using a continuous chromic suture and in second group this layer was left unsutured. The analgesic requirement and the degree of PAIN over the first 24 hours following the surgery were further assessed. Two groups were compared by t-test and chi-square test.Findings: Two groups were similar in terms of age, weight, parity, and cause of cesarean. In non-closure group, the mean use of analgesic over 24 hours was 90.8 mg of Voltaren and 1.16 capsules of mefenamic acid whereas in closure group it was 112.9 mg of Voltaren and 2 capsules of mefenamic acid and the difference was found significant, statistically (p=0/000). The mean VAS in closure and non-closure groups over 24 hours was 5.5 and 4.24, respectively. The difference between two groups was also shown to be statistically significant (p=0/000).Conclusion: Non-closure of parietal PERITONEUM in CESAREAN SECTION produces a significant reduction in post operative PAIN and analgesic use.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

HAJSEIDJAVADI, E.S., & RASEKH, F.. (2006). POST-CESAREAN PAIN IN CLOSURE VERSUS NON-CLOSURE OF PARIETAL PERITONEUM. JOURNAL OF INFLAMMATORY DISEASES (THE JOURNAL OF QAZVIN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES), 10(3 (40)), 45-48. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/49212/en

Vancouver: Copy

HAJSEIDJAVADI E.S., RASEKH F.. POST-CESAREAN PAIN IN CLOSURE VERSUS NON-CLOSURE OF PARIETAL PERITONEUM. JOURNAL OF INFLAMMATORY DISEASES (THE JOURNAL OF QAZVIN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES)[Internet]. 2006;10(3 (40)):45-48. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/49212/en

IEEE: Copy

E.S. HAJSEIDJAVADI, and F. RASEKH, “POST-CESAREAN PAIN IN CLOSURE VERSUS NON-CLOSURE OF PARIETAL PERITONEUM,” JOURNAL OF INFLAMMATORY DISEASES (THE JOURNAL OF QAZVIN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES), vol. 10, no. 3 (40), pp. 45–48, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/49212/en

Related Journal Papers