مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

816
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

RAPID HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN REHABILITATION HOSPITAL: REVIEW ARTICLE

Pages

  712-726

Abstract

 Background: Medical advances, improved health status, and increased longevity have led to increased elderly in the society; therefore, the role of REHABILITATION CENTERs in the service industry has grown considerably in the two past decades.Methods: The studies compared types of REHABILITATION CENTERs for the treatment of patients with motor or perception disability and other methods commonly used in rehabilitation, in terms of functional outcomes, Barthel index, and COST-EFFECTIVENESS, were evaluated. The Cochrane, CRD (Centre for Reviews and Dissemination), Scopus, and Google scholar databases were searched until June 2012.Results were analyzed using qualitative method.Findings: According to 15 included articles, the Barthel index scores in patients with an inpatient rehabilitation (42±29 points) were more than outpatient rehabilitation (26±23 points) (P<0.050).For inpatient centers, early rehabilitation led to the rapid acquisition of functional abilities than outpatient centers (1.55 vs.0.50). Regarding to COST-EFFECTIVENESS of heart diseases, the adjusted cost difference between outpatient and inpatient rehabilitation was about-2895 Euro (P=0.102); adjusted effect difference was about 0.018 QALY (Quality-adjusted life year) in favor of outpatients rehabilitation, too.Conclusion: With regard to the potential of rehabilitation services and outpatient clinics in day clinics, the establishment of REHABILITATION CENTERs was not cost-effective. So, it is proposed to provide services to disabled patients in “rehabilitation units” established in specialized hospitals.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    DOAEE, SHEILA, OLIYAEEMANESH, ALIREZA, & MOBINIZADEH, MOHAMADREZA. (2013). RAPID HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN REHABILITATION HOSPITAL: REVIEW ARTICLE. JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL (I.U.M.S), 31(237), 712-726. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/49714/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    DOAEE SHEILA, OLIYAEEMANESH ALIREZA, MOBINIZADEH MOHAMADREZA. RAPID HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN REHABILITATION HOSPITAL: REVIEW ARTICLE. JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL (I.U.M.S)[Internet]. 2013;31(237):712-726. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/49714/en

    IEEE: Copy

    SHEILA DOAEE, ALIREZA OLIYAEEMANESH, and MOHAMADREZA MOBINIZADEH, “RAPID HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN REHABILITATION HOSPITAL: REVIEW ARTICLE,” JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL (I.U.M.S), vol. 31, no. 237, pp. 712–726, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/49714/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button