مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

569
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY OF BILATERAL INFRAORBITAL NERVE BLOCK USING LOCAL MARCAINE AND PETHIDINE WITH LOCAL MARCAINE AND INTRAVENOUS PETHIDINE

Pages

  1107-1112

Abstract

 Background: CLEFT LIP is one of the most common congenital anomalies in the world. There has been recently a considerable increase in use of local methods. In this regard, opioids are the common adjuvants but their safety and efficacy have not been studied extensively in children undergoing CLEFT LIP repair. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of local pethidine in comparison with intravenous pethidine in patients undergoing bilateral infraorbital NERVE BLOCK.Methods: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study, 40 children undergoing CLEFT LIP repair allocated randomly to two groups. Group 1 received infraorbital injection of Marcaine and pethidine; and group 2 received infraorbital injection of Marcaine and intravenous pethidine. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software.Findings: The mean pain score was 5.15 ± 1.87 and 5.85 ± 2.10 in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P=0.21). There was no significant difference in postoperative analgesic requirements between the groups (P>0.05). There were no major complications in both groups.Conclusion: There was no significant differences between addition of pethidine to Marcaine and intravenous injection of pethidine in terms of POSTOPERATIVE PAIN score, duration of hospitalization, and postoperative analgesic requirements. Although no major complications were found, intravenous injection of pethidine is not suggested for CLEFT LIP repair in children.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    HAJIGHOLAM SARYAZDI, HAMID, AGHADAVOUDI, OMID, SHAFA, AMIR, & SOLTANI HAFSHEJANI, AMIN. (2017). COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY OF BILATERAL INFRAORBITAL NERVE BLOCK USING LOCAL MARCAINE AND PETHIDINE WITH LOCAL MARCAINE AND INTRAVENOUS PETHIDINE. JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL (I.U.M.S), 35(444 ), 1107-1112. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/49900/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    HAJIGHOLAM SARYAZDI HAMID, AGHADAVOUDI OMID, SHAFA AMIR, SOLTANI HAFSHEJANI AMIN. COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY OF BILATERAL INFRAORBITAL NERVE BLOCK USING LOCAL MARCAINE AND PETHIDINE WITH LOCAL MARCAINE AND INTRAVENOUS PETHIDINE. JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL (I.U.M.S)[Internet]. 2017;35(444 ):1107-1112. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/49900/en

    IEEE: Copy

    HAMID HAJIGHOLAM SARYAZDI, OMID AGHADAVOUDI, AMIR SHAFA, and AMIN SOLTANI HAFSHEJANI, “COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY OF BILATERAL INFRAORBITAL NERVE BLOCK USING LOCAL MARCAINE AND PETHIDINE WITH LOCAL MARCAINE AND INTRAVENOUS PETHIDINE,” JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL (I.U.M.S), vol. 35, no. 444 , pp. 1107–1112, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/49900/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button