COMPARISON OF TWO PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR LENS, ARTIFLEX VERSUS IMPLANTABLE CONTACT LENS, FOR CORRECTION OF HIGH MYOPIA

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

GHOREISHI MOHAMMAD; NASROLLAHI KOBRA; MASJEDI AMIN; ZANDI ALIREZA; RAHGOZAR AMINHOSSEIN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Isfahan Medical School Year:2011 | Volume:29 | Issue:129 Page(s): 157-164

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

4,278

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF TWO PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR LENS, ARTIFLEX VERSUS IMPLANTABLE CONTACT LENS, FOR CORRECTION OF HIGH MYOPIA

Author(s)

Keywords

MYOPIAQ3

PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR LENSQ2

Abstract

Background: Refractive eye are the most common people eye complaints and there are different ways to refractive correction. In this study we compare the effect of two PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR LENSes, Artiflex versus Implantable Contact Lens (ICL).Methods: In a prospective clinical trial study, 40 eyes of 20 patients who came to ophthalmology clinic to correct their refractive error were examined. In 20 eyes artiflex was inserted randomly and in the other 20 eyes, ICL was inserted. After 6 months uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), contrast sensitivity, intraocular pressure (IOP), specular microscopy and anterior uveitis was assessed in both groups.Findings: In this study, there is no statistical difference between UCVA, BCVA, IOP, cataract incidence, contrast sensitivity, specular microscopy 6 months after surgery in both groups.40% of eyes in Artiflex group developed anterior chamber reaction 6 months post-operatively but no patient in ICL group. So there is obvious difference in the rate of anterior chamber reaction between these two groups.Conclusion: These two lenses have similar outcomes except in the incidence rate of anterior chamber reaction that is greater in the artiflex group. So these two lenses are safe with predictable outcome in treating high MYOPIA.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

GHOREISHI, MOHAMMAD, NASROLLAHI, KOBRA, MASJEDI, AMIN, ZANDI, ALIREZA, & RAHGOZAR, AMINHOSSEIN. (2011). COMPARISON OF TWO PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR LENS, ARTIFLEX VERSUS IMPLANTABLE CONTACT LENS, FOR CORRECTION OF HIGH MYOPIA. JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL (I.U.M.S), 29(129), 157-164. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/50014/en

Vancouver: Copy

GHOREISHI MOHAMMAD, NASROLLAHI KOBRA, MASJEDI AMIN, ZANDI ALIREZA, RAHGOZAR AMINHOSSEIN. COMPARISON OF TWO PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR LENS, ARTIFLEX VERSUS IMPLANTABLE CONTACT LENS, FOR CORRECTION OF HIGH MYOPIA. JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL (I.U.M.S)[Internet]. 2011;29(129):157-164. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/50014/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMAD GHOREISHI, KOBRA NASROLLAHI, AMIN MASJEDI, ALIREZA ZANDI, and AMINHOSSEIN RAHGOZAR, “COMPARISON OF TWO PHAKIC INTRAOCULAR LENS, ARTIFLEX VERSUS IMPLANTABLE CONTACT LENS, FOR CORRECTION OF HIGH MYOPIA,” JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL (I.U.M.S), vol. 29, no. 129, pp. 157–164, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/50014/en

Related Journal Papers