مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

793
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF EFFECT AND COMPLICATION OF UNILATERAL SPINAL ANESTHESIA VERSUS STANDARD SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY OF LOWER LIMB

Pages

  231-236

Abstract

 IntroductionRestricted sympathetic block during SPINAL ANESTHESIA may minimize hemodynamic change. This prospective randomized study compared unilateral and bilateral SPINAL ANESTHESIA with respect to intra and postoperative advantage and complication of each technique.Materials and MethodsSpinal anesthesia with 0.5% hyperbaric BUPIVACAINE and 25G Quincke needle was induced in two group of patients with physical status ASA I-II admitted to orthopedic surgeries. In group A dural puncture was performed with the patient in sitting position with 2.5cc hyperbaric BUPIVACAINE and then in supine positon. In group B dural puncture was performed with the patient in lateral decubitus position with 1.5cc hyperbaric BUPIVACAINE with the line operated down ward. The speed of injection was at 1ml/30s. duration of lateral decubitus positon was twenty minutes.ResultsDemographical data were similar. The onset time of sensory and motor block was significantly shorter in group A (p=0.00). Duration of motor and sensory block was shorter in group B (p<5%). The success rate of unilateral SPINAL ANESTHESIA in group B was 94.45%. Two patient’s spinal block Spread to the nondependent side. The incidence of complication (Nusea, headache, hypotension) was lower in group B. (p=0.02).ConclusionUnilateral SPINAL ANESTHESIA with low dose, low volume and low flow injection technique provides adequate sensory and motor block and stable hemodynamic parameters in orthopedic surgery of LOWER LIMB. Patients Satisfacation also was better and avoids unnecessary paralysis on the non operated side.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    MOOSAVI TEKYE, SEYYED MOSTAFA, ALIPOUR, MOHAMAD, & GHORBANIAN, EHSANOLAH. (2013). COMPARISON OF EFFECT AND COMPLICATION OF UNILATERAL SPINAL ANESTHESIA VERSUS STANDARD SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY OF LOWER LIMB. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF MASHHAD UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 55(4), 231-236. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/52197/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    MOOSAVI TEKYE SEYYED MOSTAFA, ALIPOUR MOHAMAD, GHORBANIAN EHSANOLAH. COMPARISON OF EFFECT AND COMPLICATION OF UNILATERAL SPINAL ANESTHESIA VERSUS STANDARD SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY OF LOWER LIMB. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF MASHHAD UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2013;55(4):231-236. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/52197/en

    IEEE: Copy

    SEYYED MOSTAFA MOOSAVI TEKYE, MOHAMAD ALIPOUR, and EHSANOLAH GHORBANIAN, “COMPARISON OF EFFECT AND COMPLICATION OF UNILATERAL SPINAL ANESTHESIA VERSUS STANDARD SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY OF LOWER LIMB,” MEDICAL JOURNAL OF MASHHAD UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 231–236, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/52197/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top