EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT SOFTWARE PACKAGES IN FLOW MODELING UNDER BRIDGE STRUCTURES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

DASTOURANI M.T.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: WATER AND WASTEWATER Year:2007 | Volume:17 | Issue:4 (60) Page(s): 29-48

Download Full-Text

View:

258

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT SOFTWARE PACKAGES IN FLOW MODELING UNDER BRIDGE STRUCTURES

Author(s)

DASTOURANI M.T. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

FLOW MODELING

UNDER BRIDGE FLOW

SOFTWARE PACKAGES

HYDRODYNAMIC MODELING

BRIDGE

ISIS

MIKE11

HEC-RAS

Abstract

This study is an independent and a comparative research concerning the accuracy, capability and suitability of three well known packages of ISIS, MIKEI 1 and HEC-RAS as hydraulic river modeling SOFTWARE PACKAGES for modeling the flow through BRIDGEs. The research project was designed to assess the ability of each software package to model the flow through BRIDGE structures. It was carried out using the data taken From experiments completed by a 22-meter laboratory flume at the University of Birmingham. The flume has a compound cross section containing a main channel and two flood plains on either side. For this study a smooth main channel and a smooth floodplain have been assumed. Two types of BRIDGEs are modeled in this research; a multiple opening semi-circular arch BRIDGE and a single opening straight deck BRIDGE. For each BRIDGE, two different simulations were carried out using two different upstream boundaries as low flow and high. flow simulations. According to the results, all three packages were able to model arch and US BPR BRIDGEs but in some cases they presented different results. The highest water elevation upstream the BRIDGE (maximum afflux) was the main parameter to be compared to the measured values. ISIS and HEC-RAS (especially HEC-RAS) seem to be more efficient to model arch BRIDGE. However, in some cases, MIKE 11 produced considerably higher results than those of the other two packages. To model USBPR BRIDGE, all three packages produced reasonable results. However, the results by HEC-RAS are the best when the outputs are compared to the experimental data.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

DASTOURANI, M.T.. (2007). EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT SOFTWARE PACKAGES IN FLOW MODELING UNDER BRIDGE STRUCTURES. WATER AND WASTEWATER, 17(4 (60)), 29-48. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/545223/en

Vancouver: Copy

DASTOURANI M.T.. EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT SOFTWARE PACKAGES IN FLOW MODELING UNDER BRIDGE STRUCTURES. WATER AND WASTEWATER[Internet]. 2007;17(4 (60)):29-48. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/545223/en

IEEE: Copy

M.T. DASTOURANI, “EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT SOFTWARE PACKAGES IN FLOW MODELING UNDER BRIDGE STRUCTURES,” WATER AND WASTEWATER, vol. 17, no. 4 (60), pp. 29–48, 2007, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/545223/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops