CLINICAL COMPARISON OF PULPAL ANESTHESIA RESULTING FROM TWO MANDIBULAR BLOCK ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES: CONVENTIONAL AND GOW – GATES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SHEYKH REZAEI M.S.; SALMANI E.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC DENTAL ASSOCIATION OF IRAN (MAJALLAH-I-DANDANPIZISHKI) Year:2004 | Volume:16 | Issue:3 (51) Page(s): 39-46

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,782

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

CLINICAL COMPARISON OF PULPAL ANESTHESIA RESULTING FROM TWO MANDIBULAR BLOCK ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES: CONVENTIONAL AND GOW – GATES

Author(s)

SHEYKH REZAEI M.S. | SALMANI E. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

LOCAL ANESTHESIAQ3

GOWQ4

GATES TECHNIQUEQ4

MANDIBULAR BLOCKQ4

Abstract

Background and aim: One of the current problems in endodontic treatment is the establishment of optimal anesthesia on mandible. In this clinical study, two approved MANDIBULAR BLOCK technique were compared in the establishment of pulpal anesthesia.Materials and Methods: Inferior dental anesthesia via conventional and GOW - GATES TECHNIQUEs were evaluated using onset of anesthesia, pain severity duriny injection, aspiration test, pulpal anesthesia (via ice test, cavity test and pain during entrance into pulp chamber) and pinprick test (inferior alveolar, lingual and long buccal nerves). 58 patients requiring root canal rteatment of mandibular molars were divided into two groups.They were given injections of 1.8 ml of %2 lidocaine with adrenaline (1: 80,000). Results were analyzed using Mamm -Whitney and t-student tests.Results: No significant differences were found between two techniques in ice test, cavity test, pain upon entrance to pulp chamber, pinprick test, aspiration test and injection better results about injection pain and aspiration test. Time required for lip and tongue anesthesia in conventional technique was less than GOW - Gates (P< 0.001) although buccal nerve was anesthetized more in GOW - GATES TECHNIQUE (P=0.01). Although the aspiration test did not show a significant difference, but the lack of positive aspitation case in GOW - GATES TECHNIQUE, in conparison with %10.7 in conventional technique seemed to be important. No significant difference in pulpal anesthesia between two techniques was shown, however, %57.1 of patients had pain during entrance to pulp chamber in conventional technique comparing to %39.2 in GOW - GATES TECHNIQUE. The buccal nerve was anesthetized more in GOW – GATES TECHNIQUE (%75) as compared with conventional one (%42.9), which was significantly different (p=0.01), but other branches (inferior alveolar and lingual nerves) were anesthetized equally in both applied techniques. On average, patients acquired lip and tongue numbness in 1.42 and 3.27 minutes, respectively in conventional method but more than 7 minutes was required in GOW-Gates technique (p<0.001). Conclusion: Irrespective of the operator clinical experience, GOW-Gales technique appears to be more effective in pulpal anesthesia although more slowly yielded anesthesia, as compared with conventional method, is one of its disadvantages.

Cites

No record.

References

COMPARISON OF TWO LOCAL ANESTHESIA TECHNIQUES (CONVENTIONAL & AKINOSI) FOR INFERIOR ALVEOLAR DENTAL NERVE

Cite

APA: Copy

SHEYKH REZAEI, M.S., & SALMANI, E.. (2004). CLINICAL COMPARISON OF PULPAL ANESTHESIA RESULTING FROM TWO MANDIBULAR BLOCK ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES: CONVENTIONAL AND GOW – GATES. JOURNAL OF IRANIAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION (JIDA) (MAJALLAH-I-DANDANPIZISHKI), 16(3 (51)), 39-46. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/54665/en

Vancouver: Copy

SHEYKH REZAEI M.S., SALMANI E.. CLINICAL COMPARISON OF PULPAL ANESTHESIA RESULTING FROM TWO MANDIBULAR BLOCK ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES: CONVENTIONAL AND GOW – GATES. JOURNAL OF IRANIAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION (JIDA) (MAJALLAH-I-DANDANPIZISHKI)[Internet]. 2004;16(3 (51)):39-46. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/54665/en

IEEE: Copy

M.S. SHEYKH REZAEI, and E. SALMANI, “CLINICAL COMPARISON OF PULPAL ANESTHESIA RESULTING FROM TWO MANDIBULAR BLOCK ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES: CONVENTIONAL AND GOW – GATES,” JOURNAL OF IRANIAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION (JIDA) (MAJALLAH-I-DANDANPIZISHKI), vol. 16, no. 3 (51), pp. 39–46, 2004, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/54665/en

Related Journal Papers