مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,103
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

MICROLEAKAGE OF SELF- ADHESIVE RESIN CEMENTS COMPARED WITH RESIN CEMENTS CONTAININGETCH & RINSE ADHESIVES

Pages

  208-216

Abstract

 Background and Aim: Current SELF-adhesive resin cements have become popular for esthetic restorations. The purpose of this study was to compare the MICROLEAKAGE of 2 SELF-adhesive resin cements and 2 etch and rinse versions of the same brands.Materials and Methods: Forty human third molars were randomly assigned to 4 experimental groups: 1-Rely X Unicem, 2- Rely X ARC+ Acid etch 37% + Single Bond, 3- Nexus 3 Acid etch 37% + Optibond Solo, and 4- Maxcem Elite. MICROLEAKAGEs of the specimens were then measured with a four point scoring system at both the cervical & occlusal areas, with the aid of a stereomicroscope. MICROLEAKAGE scores were compared using Kruskul-Wallis analysis, followed by relative Dunn test.Results: The MICROLEAKAGE of Rely X Unicem and Nexus 3 were significantly less in the occlusal region (P<0.05), whereas in the cervical area there was no significant difference in MICROLEAKAGE between Rely X Unicem and Rely X ARC (P= 0.0087). The MICROLEAKAGE of Nexus 3 was significantly less than that of Rely X Unicem. Maxcem Elite showed the highestlevel of MICROLEAKAGE (P<0.05).Conclusion: MICROLEAKAGE of both cements using etch & rinse adhesive systems were significantly lower in comparison with their SELF- etch counterparts both at the cervical & occlusal areas. (P<0.05).

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    HESHMAT, H., HOORIZADGANJKAR, MARYAM, ZEINALI, S., & AGHAJANI, FARZANEH. (2012). MICROLEAKAGE OF SELF- ADHESIVE RESIN CEMENTS COMPARED WITH RESIN CEMENTS CONTAININGETCH & RINSE ADHESIVES. JOURNAL OF IRANIAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION (JIDA) (MAJALLAH-I-DANDANPIZISHKI), 24(3 (84)), 208-216. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/54762/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    HESHMAT H., HOORIZADGANJKAR MARYAM, ZEINALI S., AGHAJANI FARZANEH. MICROLEAKAGE OF SELF- ADHESIVE RESIN CEMENTS COMPARED WITH RESIN CEMENTS CONTAININGETCH & RINSE ADHESIVES. JOURNAL OF IRANIAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION (JIDA) (MAJALLAH-I-DANDANPIZISHKI)[Internet]. 2012;24(3 (84)):208-216. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/54762/en

    IEEE: Copy

    H. HESHMAT, MARYAM HOORIZADGANJKAR, S. ZEINALI, and FARZANEH AGHAJANI, “MICROLEAKAGE OF SELF- ADHESIVE RESIN CEMENTS COMPARED WITH RESIN CEMENTS CONTAININGETCH & RINSE ADHESIVES,” JOURNAL OF IRANIAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION (JIDA) (MAJALLAH-I-DANDANPIZISHKI), vol. 24, no. 3 (84), pp. 208–216, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/54762/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button