INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT GI RESTORATIVE TECHNIQUES ON MICROLEAKAGE OF CL II SANDWICH RESTORATIONS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

GHAVAM NASIRI MARJANEH; HAJIZADEH H.; SARABI N.; ALIZADEH MAHYAREH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

787

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT GI RESTORATIVE TECHNIQUES ON MICROLEAKAGE OF CL II SANDWICH RESTORATIONS

Author(s)

GHAVAM NASIRI MARJANEH | HAJIZADEH H. | SARABI N. | ALIZADEH MAHYAREH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

MICROLEAKAGEQ3

CL II RESTORATIONQ2

GLASS-IONOMERQ3

SANDWICH TECHNIQUEQ3

Abstract

Background & Aim: SANDWICH TECHNIQUE with glass ionomer (GI) has been recommended to overcome gingival MICROLEAKAGE. The study objectives were to compare open and closed SANDWICH TECHNIQUEs and evaluate GI injection in sandwich restorations.Materials & Methods: Sixty extracted sound premolar teeth were divided into 4 groups (n=15). A Class II cavity with gingival margin below CEJ was prepared on each tooth. Teeth were restored using glass ionomer (Fuji II LC), adhesive (Single Bond) and resin composite (Z250) as follows: Group 1, Open sandwich, GI injection; Group 2, Open sandwich, placing GI by a probe; Group 3, Closed sandwich, GI injection; Group 4, Closed SANDWICH TECHNIQUE, placing GI by a probe. Dye penetration was performed by using fushin after thermocycling. Teeth were sectioned then dye penetration was evaluated (0-3 scores) under a stereomicroscope. Statistical analysis was conducted using Kruskal Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: The least MICROLEAKAGE was observed in closed SANDWICH TECHNIQUE with GI injection and the most MICROLEAKAGE was observed in open sandwich using GI by a probe. When comparing the handling techniques, it was shown that using a syringe was significantly better than using a probe (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference between open and closed SANDWICH TECHNIQUEs although the mean dye penetration happened less in closed technique. Conclusion: According to the results of this study, injection of GI into cavity is recommended because of better access and superior adaptation of GI with cavity walls.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

GHAVAM NASIRI, MARJANEH, HAJIZADEH, H., SARABI, N., & ALIZADEH, MAHYAREH. (2008). INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT GI RESTORATIVE TECHNIQUES ON MICROLEAKAGE OF CL II SANDWICH RESTORATIONS. JOURNAL OF IRANIAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION (JIDA) (MAJALLAH-I-DANDANPIZISHKI), 20(3 (68)), 227-233. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/54781/en

Vancouver: Copy

GHAVAM NASIRI MARJANEH, HAJIZADEH H., SARABI N., ALIZADEH MAHYAREH. INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT GI RESTORATIVE TECHNIQUES ON MICROLEAKAGE OF CL II SANDWICH RESTORATIONS. JOURNAL OF IRANIAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION (JIDA) (MAJALLAH-I-DANDANPIZISHKI)[Internet]. 2008;20(3 (68)):227-233. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/54781/en

IEEE: Copy

MARJANEH GHAVAM NASIRI, H. HAJIZADEH, N. SARABI, and MAHYAREH ALIZADEH, “INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT GI RESTORATIVE TECHNIQUES ON MICROLEAKAGE OF CL II SANDWICH RESTORATIONS,” JOURNAL OF IRANIAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION (JIDA) (MAJALLAH-I-DANDANPIZISHKI), vol. 20, no. 3 (68), pp. 227–233, 2008, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/54781/en

Related Journal Papers