مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

695
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

1

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF WATER ABSORPTION AND SOLUBILITY OF ACROPARS AND VISCOGEL TISSUE CONDITIONERS

Pages

  105-111

Abstract

 Background and Aim: Soft denture lining materials have been used in dentistry for almost a century. The aim of this study was to measure WATER ABSORPTION and SOLUBILITY of Acrosoft TISSUE CONDITIONER samples and compare them with those of Viscogel samples.Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, stainless steel molds were prepared in disk shape of 0.5±0.05mm thickness and 50±7mm diameter. Fifteen specimens were prepared from each material. At first, all of them were weighed and place into distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours. Then they were removed and reweighed. These procedures were also repeated at 4 and 7 days. After 7 days, specimens were dried in a desicator at 37°C, removed and finally reweighed. Data were subjected to student T - test.Results: The mean values of WATER ABSORPTION at 24 h, 4 and 7 days were 1.4394±0.0146, 1.384±0.0078 and 1.3595±0.0027 percent for Viscogel gel and 1.2423±0.0260, 1.5520±0.0236 and 2.0537±0.0273 percent for Acropars. Statistical analysis showed significant differences in the mean WATER ABSORPTION at different time periods (P<0.001). Moreover, Acrosoft showed higher SOLUBILITY (1.7452±0.0234 percent) than Viscogel (1.6850±0.0227 percent). This difference was also statistically significant (P<0.001).Conclusion: WATER ABSORPTION and SOLUBILITY of Acrosoft samples were significantly higher than those of Viscogel samples.

Cites

References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    GOLBIDI, F., & BEHDADMEHR, B.. (2006). COMPARISON OF WATER ABSORPTION AND SOLUBILITY OF ACROPARS AND VISCOGEL TISSUE CONDITIONERS. JOURNAL OF IRANIAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION (JIDA) (MAJALLAH-I-DANDANPIZISHKI), 18(1 (58)), 105-111. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/54842/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    GOLBIDI F., BEHDADMEHR B.. COMPARISON OF WATER ABSORPTION AND SOLUBILITY OF ACROPARS AND VISCOGEL TISSUE CONDITIONERS. JOURNAL OF IRANIAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION (JIDA) (MAJALLAH-I-DANDANPIZISHKI)[Internet]. 2006;18(1 (58)):105-111. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/54842/en

    IEEE: Copy

    F. GOLBIDI, and B. BEHDADMEHR, “COMPARISON OF WATER ABSORPTION AND SOLUBILITY OF ACROPARS AND VISCOGEL TISSUE CONDITIONERS,” JOURNAL OF IRANIAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION (JIDA) (MAJALLAH-I-DANDANPIZISHKI), vol. 18, no. 1 (58), pp. 105–111, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/54842/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button