CLINICAL COMPARISON OF MECHANICAL AND CHEMOMECHANICAL METHODS IN REMOVING DEEP DENTINAL CARIES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

DARABI F.; KIA ROSTAMI N.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC DENTAL ASSOCIATION OF IRAN (MAJALLAH-I-DANDANPIZISHKI) Year:2007 | Volume:18 | Issue:4 (61) Page(s): 76-82

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

721

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

CLINICAL COMPARISON OF MECHANICAL AND CHEMOMECHANICAL METHODS IN REMOVING DEEP DENTINAL CARIES

Author(s)

DARABI F. | KIA ROSTAMI N. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CARIES REMOVALQ3

CLINICAL TRIALQ3

DEEP CARIESQ3

CARISOLVQ3

Abstract

Background and Aim: The use of CARISOLVTM decreases unnecessary removal of sound dental tissue and reduces the possibility of pulpal exposure. However, it is expensive and time-consuming and its efficacy has not been clearly defined. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy, safety and efficiency of removing DEEP CARIES using conventional mechanical methods alone and in conjunction with CARISOLV.Materials and Methods: This investigation was a single-blind randomized CLINICAL TRIAL. Forty individuals, each with a deep carious tooth (0.5-1 mm from the pulp) without signs and symptoms of necrosis or irreversible pulpitis were selected and randomly divided into two study-groups: A, all caries were mechanically removed using rotary instruments and B, CARISOLV was applied on deep carious lesions and the rest of the caries were mechanically eliminated. All cavities were evaluated by a dental probe. After complete CARIES REMOVAL the teeth were filled as usual. The outcome variables were complete CARIES REMOVAL, pulpal exposure and time taken to remove caries. The results were analyzed by X2 and Mann-Whitney tests.Results: Three pulpal exposures occurred in group A and one in group B without a statistically significant difference. Regarding complete CARIES REMOVAL, the two methods were similar. The mean caries-removal time was 16±6.8 min in group A and 25.2±6.3 min in group B (P<0.001). The amount of Carislov used for each tooth was 0.17 cc.Conclusion: Application of the mechanical and chemomechanical methods simultaneously, is more time-consuming and does not seem to significantly improve the treatment results.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

DARABI, F., & KIA ROSTAMI, N.. (2007). CLINICAL COMPARISON OF MECHANICAL AND CHEMOMECHANICAL METHODS IN REMOVING DEEP DENTINAL CARIES. JOURNAL OF IRANIAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION (JIDA) (MAJALLAH-I-DANDANPIZISHKI), 18(4 (61)), 76-82. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/54975/en

Vancouver: Copy

DARABI F., KIA ROSTAMI N.. CLINICAL COMPARISON OF MECHANICAL AND CHEMOMECHANICAL METHODS IN REMOVING DEEP DENTINAL CARIES. JOURNAL OF IRANIAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION (JIDA) (MAJALLAH-I-DANDANPIZISHKI)[Internet]. 2007;18(4 (61)):76-82. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/54975/en

IEEE: Copy

F. DARABI, and N. KIA ROSTAMI, “CLINICAL COMPARISON OF MECHANICAL AND CHEMOMECHANICAL METHODS IN REMOVING DEEP DENTINAL CARIES,” JOURNAL OF IRANIAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION (JIDA) (MAJALLAH-I-DANDANPIZISHKI), vol. 18, no. 4 (61), pp. 76–82, 2007, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/54975/en

Related Journal Papers