NORMAL SALINE VERSUS HYPERTONIC 3% SALINE: IT’S EFFICACY IN NON-ACUTE RHINOSINUSITIS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

BERJIS NEZAMODDIN; SONBOLASTAN SEYYED MEHDI; OKHOVAT SEYYED HANIF; NARIMANI ALI ASGHAR; RAZMJUI JALEH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Year:2011 | Volume:23 | Issue:3 (62) Page(s): 23-28

Download Full-Text

View:

436

Download:

304

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

NORMAL SALINE VERSUS HYPERTONIC 3% SALINE: IT’S EFFICACY IN NON-ACUTE RHINOSINUSITIS

Author(s)

Keywords

CHRONIC RHINOSINUSITIS

HYPERTONIC SALINE

POSTNASAL DISCHARGE

Abstract

Introduction: Sinusitis is one of the most common diseases in general and in otolaryngology practice, but the optimal therapeutic options have not yet been fully developed. This manuscript will try to compare normal saline nasal douching with HYPERTONIC SALINE in reducing symptoms and improving its signs.Materials and Methods: One hundred and fourteen patients suffering from non acute rhinosinusitis, documented by history, physical examination and radiologic studies were divided into normal saline and HYPERTONIC SALINE groups, each consisting of 57 patients. data were obtained by physical examination and a questionnaire..Results: Type of treatment had no significant effect on headache, morning dryness of mouth and pharynx and fatigue. Nontheless, nasal congestion, purulent discharge and POSTNASAL DISCHARGE were reported to have improved in the group treated with HYPERTONIC SALINE versus the normal saline group. Patient satisfaction also showed better scores in the HYPERTONIC SALINE group.Conclusion: HYPERTONIC SALINE (3%) is more effective for nasal irrigation than normal saline in CHRONIC RHINOSINUSITIS.

Multimedia

No record.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

BERJIS, NEZAMODDIN, SONBOLASTAN, SEYYED MEHDI, OKHOVAT, SEYYED HANIF, NARIMANI, ALI ASGHAR, & RAZMJUI, JALEH. (2011). NORMAL SALINE VERSUS HYPERTONIC 3% SALINE: IT’S EFFICACY IN NON-ACUTE RHINOSINUSITIS. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 23(3 (62)), 23-28. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/571439/en

Vancouver: Copy

BERJIS NEZAMODDIN, SONBOLASTAN SEYYED MEHDI, OKHOVAT SEYYED HANIF, NARIMANI ALI ASGHAR, RAZMJUI JALEH. NORMAL SALINE VERSUS HYPERTONIC 3% SALINE: IT’S EFFICACY IN NON-ACUTE RHINOSINUSITIS. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY[Internet]. 2011;23(3 (62)):23-28. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/571439/en

IEEE: Copy

NEZAMODDIN BERJIS, SEYYED MEHDI SONBOLASTAN, SEYYED HANIF OKHOVAT, ALI ASGHAR NARIMANI, and JALEH RAZMJUI, “NORMAL SALINE VERSUS HYPERTONIC 3% SALINE: IT’S EFFICACY IN NON-ACUTE RHINOSINUSITIS,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, vol. 23, no. 3 (62), pp. 23–28, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/571439/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops