NATURAL REASONING

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MARDIHA S.M.

Educational Videos and Scientific Workshops

Scientific Information Database

ISSN: 2588-4824

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: NAMEH-YE OLUM-E EJTEMAI Year:2006 | Volume:- | Issue:29 Page(s): 91-111

Download Full-Text

View:

240

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

NATURAL REASONING

Author(s)

MARDIHA S.M. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

SOCIAL SCIENCES

EXPERIMENTAL REASONING

FORMAL LANGUAGE

NATURAL REASONING

NATURAL LANGUAGE

EPISTEMOLOGICAL PLURALISM

Abstract

The methodology of SOCIAL SCIENCES has always been a matter of much controversy, and it probably will remain so in the foreseeable future. The debate on the method and nature of these sciences is a corollary of their historical development: it began early, as they evolved and rose to prominence. The most important methodological issue in this field was the question of the extent social and physical sciences could be considered similar or different. In philosophy of SOCIAL SCIENCES a dualistic version maintains that the method of argumentation in these sciences is "natural reasoning". The location of NATURAL REASONING is somewhere between the customary persuasion method and law-like verification method. NATURAL REASONING depends upon "natural language" more than formalization. It is being said that within such a space, SOCIAL SCIENCES afford neither falsification nor generalization. Such a claim is perhaps less disputable in political science and anthropology than it is in sociology and economics. Nonetheless, the hard shell of this claim Govers all human and SOCIAL SCIENCES. This claim amounts to a theory which holds on a fundamental duality of method in human and non-human sciences.The present article seeks exposition and interpretation of such an idea of duality. It looks at its foundations, contents, implications, and presents a cursory criticism of it. Framed within a philosophical analysis and a comparative method, the author will defend the idea that a hardliner dualism is not viable versus a methodological pluralism which does not deny the unity of genus science.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MARDIHA, S.M.. (2006). NATURAL REASONING. NAMEH-YE OLUM-E EJTEMAI, -(29), 91-111. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/581573/en

Vancouver: Copy

MARDIHA S.M.. NATURAL REASONING. NAMEH-YE OLUM-E EJTEMAI[Internet]. 2006;-(29):91-111. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/581573/en

IEEE: Copy

S.M. MARDIHA, “NATURAL REASONING,” NAMEH-YE OLUM-E EJTEMAI, vol. -, no. 29, pp. 91–111, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/581573/en

Related Journal Papers