مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

4,121
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

8

Information Journal Paper

Title

WHICH METHOD OF TEACHING WOULD BE BETTER, COOPERATIVE OR LECTURE?

Pages

  24-31

Abstract

 Introduction: M ost of the knowledge acquired through lecturing is forgotten rapidly. As DENTISTRY is becoming a more complicated field of study and as new techniques are introduced, the use of modern educational approaches to promote lifelong learning becomes necessary. This study is to compare cooperative TEACHING METHOD and LECTURE METHOD in terms of their impact on students' learning and their satisfaction in school of DENTISTRY in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences.Methods: In this quasi experimental study sampling was census and all 9th semester students (60 students) taking theoretical orthodontics (I) were included. One topic, etiology of mandibular abnormalities, was taught to both randomly selected experiment & control groups.First, to assess knowledge & satisfaction of the students with LECTURE METHODs for etiology, a pre-test was applied. Then both groups were taught, the control group received instruction through LECTURE METHOD and the experiment group formed 5-member subgroups and received instruction through cooperation. Then, both groups took a post-test. Data were analyzed through Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney U using SPSS 12.Results: A significant difference was found between the mean scores of the students' satisfaction before and after applying the cooperative method. Also, there was a significant difference between the pre–test scores in the lecture group and the cooperative group (p<0.001), but no significant difference was observed between post-test scores of the two groups (P=0.1).Conclusion: The study showed that cooperative TEACHING METHOD could be useful in teaching DENTISTRY students and could enhance their intrinsic motivation, which in turn could improve learning quality.

Cites

References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    MOMENI DANAEI, SHAHLA, ZARSHENAS, LADAN, OSHAGH, MORTEZA, & OMID KHODA, SEYEDEH MARYAM. (2011). WHICH METHOD OF TEACHING WOULD BE BETTER, COOPERATIVE OR LECTURE?. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, 11(1 (30)), 24-31. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/59176/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    MOMENI DANAEI SHAHLA, ZARSHENAS LADAN, OSHAGH MORTEZA, OMID KHODA SEYEDEH MARYAM. WHICH METHOD OF TEACHING WOULD BE BETTER, COOPERATIVE OR LECTURE?. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION[Internet]. 2011;11(1 (30)):24-31. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/59176/en

    IEEE: Copy

    SHAHLA MOMENI DANAEI, LADAN ZARSHENAS, MORTEZA OSHAGH, and SEYEDEH MARYAM OMID KHODA, “WHICH METHOD OF TEACHING WOULD BE BETTER, COOPERATIVE OR LECTURE?,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, vol. 11, no. 1 (30), pp. 24–31, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/59176/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button